The paradox and ethics of nondecision : the tragedy of the Atherstone-on-Stour fire.

Williamson, Derek P. (2018) The paradox and ethics of nondecision : the tragedy of the Atherstone-on-Stour fire. Doctoral thesis, University of Surrey.

	Text Des Williamson - Thesis - Approved Final - 4th April 2018.pdf - Version of Record Restricted to Repository staff only until 30 April 2021. Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (3MB)
	Text Restricting Access to Thesis Form - D P Williamson - 10th April 2018.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (844kB)

Abstract

Adopting a deconstructionist research approach, this research problematizes prevailing logocentric decision theory and offers a critical enquiry into knowledge constituting the conditions of possibility for ‘nondecision’ at the Atherstone-on-Stour fire of 2nd November 2007 at which four firefighters were tragically killed. The research therefore, makes a philosophical and conceptual contribution, presenting the concept of nondecision as a radically alternative heuristic toward explaining institutional recursive behaviours and practice. Within this research, traditional research notions of the ‘situational specificity’ of an event are abandoned in favour of an exploration of the epistemological context governing conditions for knowledge, discourse and text. Consequently, a deconstructive genealogy research methodology is developed, wherein conventional linear-rationalist research approaches to data collection and analysis are problematized and abandoned for an integrated, iterative approach to the epistemological deconstruction of genealogically sourced archival text. In terms of methodology and praxis, deconstructive genealogy therefore provides opportunities for radical enquiry into institutional knowledge and understanding constituting behaviour and practice in relation to a research case. Case analysis involves the deconstruction of texts concerning institutional fire and rescue (FRS) decision making rules and subsequently involves the genealogical sourcing of influential and contributory narrative themes explicitly cited or immanent within the text, most notably concerning health and safety of firefighters, FRS ‘culture’, and firefighter ethos and identity. Consequently, this study offers a radical enquiry into the FRS institution. Specifically, it rejects and problematizes the tendency within the literature to pursue conventional research approaches which typically reinforce managerialist discourse and performative foundationalist notions of heroism and duty. Ultimately, nondecision, it is suggested, creates space for challenging our thinking, not only concerning the conditions of possibility for life - or death - of firefighters at fires, but future behaviour and practice, with implications for the ethics of ‘decision’ and the ethical governance of institutions and organizations.

Item Type:	Thesis (Doctoral)
Divisions :	Theses
Authors :	Name Email ORCID Williamson, Derek P.
Date :	30 April 2018
Funders :	Surrey Business School Studentship
Contributors :	Contribution Name Email ORCID http://www.loc.gov/loc.terms/relators/THS Sadler-Smith, Eugene http://www.loc.gov/loc.terms/relators/THS Bristow, Alexandra
Depositing User :	Des Williamson
Date Deposited :	01 May 2018 10:42
Last Modified :	09 Nov 2018 16:39
URI:	http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/id/eprint/846166

Actions (login required)

View Item

Downloads