University of Surrey

Test tubes in the lab Research in the ATI Dance Research

How to derive consensus among various marketing journal rankings?

Theußl, S, Reutterer, T and Hornik, K (2013) How to derive consensus among various marketing journal rankings? Journal of Business Research.

Full text not available from this repository.


Despite the increasing popularity of journal rankings to evaluate the quality of research contributions, the individual rankings for journals that ranked below the top tier of publications usually feature only modest agreement. Attempts to merge rankings into meta-rankings suffer from some methodological issues, such as mixed measurement scales and incomplete data. This paper addresses the issue of how to construct suitable aggregates of individual journal rankings, using an optimization-based consensus ranking approach. The authors apply the proposed method to a subset of marketing-related journals from a list of collected journal rankings. Next, the paper studies the stability of the derived consensus solution, and the degeneration effects that occur when excluding journals and/or rankings. Finally, the authors investigate the similarities/dissimilarities of the consensus with a naive meta-ranking and with individual rankings. The results show that, even though journals are not uniformly ranked, one may derive a consensus ranking with considerably high agreement with the individual rankings. © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Item Type: Article
Divisions : Surrey research (other units)
Authors :
Theußl, S
Hornik, K
Date : 2013
DOI : 10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.08.006
Depositing User : Symplectic Elements
Date Deposited : 16 May 2017 15:27
Last Modified : 24 Jan 2020 14:42

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item


Downloads per month over past year

Information about this web site

© The University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
+44 (0)1483 300800