Environmental sustainability analysis of UK whole-wheat bioethanol and CHP systems

Martinez-Hernandez, Elias, Ibrahim, MH, Campbell, GM, Leach, Matthew, Sinclair, P and Sadhukhan, Jhuma (2013) Environmental sustainability analysis of UK whole-wheat bioethanol and CHP systems Biomass and Bioenergy, 50. pp. 52-64.

Preview	Text JBB-MS-with figures and tables.pdf Available under License : See the attached licence file. Download (775kB)
	Text JBB-MS-with figures and tables.doc Restricted to Repository staff only Available under License : See the attached licence file. Download (826kB)
Preview	Text (licence) SRI_deposit_agreement.pdf Download (33kB)

Abstract

The UK whole-wheat bioethanol and straw and DDGS-based combined heat and power (CHP) generation systems were assessed for environmental sustainability using a range of impact categories or characterisations (IC): cumulative primary fossil energy (CPE), land use, life cycle global warming potential over 100 years (GWP), acidification potential (AP), eutrophication potential (EP) and abiotic resources use (ARU). The European Union (EU) Renewable Energy Directive's target of greenhouse gas (GHG) emission saving of 60% in comparison to an equivalent fossil-based system by 2020 seems to be very challenging for stand-alone wheat bioethanol system. However, the whole-wheat integrated system, wherein the CHP from the excess straw grown in the same season and from the same land is utilised in the wheat bioethanol plant, can be demonstrated for potential sustainability improvement, achieving 85% emission reduction and 97% CPE saving compared to reference fossil systems. The net bioenergy from this system and from 172,370 ha of grade 3 land is 12.1 PJ y providing land to energy yield of 70 GJ ha y. The use of DDGS as an animal feed replacing soy meal incurs environmental emission credit, whilst its use in heat or CHP generation saves CPE. The hot spots in whole system identified under each impact category are as follows: bioethanol plant and wheat cultivation for CPE (50% and 48%), as well as for ARU (46% and 52%). EP and GWP are distributed among wheat cultivation (49% and 37%), CHP plant (26% and 30%) and bioethanol plant (25%, and 33%), respectively. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd.

Item Type:	Article
Divisions :	Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences > Centre for Environmental Strategy
Authors :	Name Email ORCID Martinez-Hernandez, Elias Ibrahim, MH Campbell, GM Leach, Matthew M.Leach@surrey.ac.uk Sinclair, P Sadhukhan, Jhuma J.Sadhukhan@surrey.ac.uk
Date :	March 2013
DOI :	10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.01.001
Copyright Disclaimer :	© 2013. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Depositing User :	Symplectic Elements
Date Deposited :	24 Apr 2013 13:40
Last Modified :	16 Jan 2019 16:43
URI:	http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/id/eprint/769905

Actions (login required)

View Item

Downloads