Preliminary Investigations of an Opposed Rotary Piston Compressor for the Air Feeding of a Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell System

Xing, Shikai, Gao, Jianbing, Tian, Guohong, Zhao, Meng and Ma, Chaochen (2020) Preliminary Investigations of an Opposed Rotary Piston Compressor for the Air Feeding of a Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell System ACS Omega, 5 (38). pp. 24733-24745.

Preview

Text Preliminary Investigations of an Opposed Rotary PistonCompressor.pdf - Accepted version Manuscript Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial. Download (5MB) | Preview

Abstract

Automotive polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell systems are attracting much attention, driven by the requirements of low automotive exhaust emissions and energy consumption. A polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell system provides opportunities for the developments in different types of air compressors. This paper proposed an opposed rotary piston compressor, which had the merits of more compact structures, less movement components, and a high pressure ratio, meeting the requirements of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell systems. Preliminary performance evaluations of the opposed rotary piston compressor were conducted under various scenarios. This will make a foundation for optimizations of outlet pipe layouts of the compressor. A three-dimensional numerical simulation approach was used; further, in-cylinder pressure evolutions, fluid mass flow rates, and P–V diagrams were analyzed. It indicated that the cyclic period of the opposed rotary piston compressor was half of reciprocating piston compressors. The specific mass flow rate of the compressor is in the range of 0.094–0.113 kg·(s·L)⁻¹ for the given scenarios. Outlet ports 1 and 2 dominated the mass flow in the discharge process under scenarios 1, 3, and 4. In-cylinder pressure profiles show multipeaks for all of these scenarios. In-cylinder pressure increased rapidly in the compression process and part of the discharge process, which led to high energy consumption and low adiabatic efficiency. The maximum adiabatic efficiency is approximately 43.96% among the given scenarios.

Item Type:	Article
Divisions :	Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences > Mechanical Engineering Sciences
Authors :	Name Email ORCID Xing, Shikai Gao, Jianbing j.gao@surrey.ac.uk Tian, Guohong g.tian@surrey.ac.uk Zhao, Meng Ma, Chaochen
Date :	29 September 2020
DOI :	10.1021/acsomega.0c03347
Copyright Disclaimer :	This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License, which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes.
Depositing User :	Clive Harris
Date Deposited :	06 Oct 2020 17:14
Last Modified :	06 Oct 2020 17:14
URI:	http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/id/eprint/858684

Actions (login required)

View Item

Downloads