University of Surrey

Test tubes in the lab Research in the ATI Dance Research

Design and recruitment of the randomized order safety trial evaluating resident-physician schedules (ROSTERS) study

Blackwell, T., Kriesel, D.R., Vittinghoff, E., O'Brien, C.S., Sullivan, J.P., Viyaran, N.C., Rahman, S.A., Lockley, S.W., Barger, L.K., Halbower, A.C. , Poynter, S.E., Wright, K.P., Yu, P.L., Zee, P.C., Landrigan, C.P., Czeisler, C.A. and Stone, K.L. (2019) Design and recruitment of the randomized order safety trial evaluating resident-physician schedules (ROSTERS) study Contemporary Clinical Trials, 80. pp. 22-33.

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Introduction: While the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education limited first year resident-physicians to 16 consecutive work hours from 2011 to 2017, resident-physicians in their second year or higher were permitted to work up to 28 h consecutively. This paper describes the Randomized Order Safety Trial Evaluating Resident-physician Schedules (ROSTERS) study, a clustered-randomized crossover clinical trial designed to evaluate the effectiveness of eliminating traditional shifts of 24 h or longer for second year or higher resident-physicians in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs). Methods: ROSTERS was a multi-center non-blinded trial in 6 PICUs at US academic medical centers. The primary aim was to compare patient safety between the extended duration work roster (EDWR), which included shifts �24 h, and a rapidly cycling work roster (RCWR), where shifts were limited to a maximum of 16 h. Information on potential medical errors was gathered and used for classification by centrally trained physician reviewers who were blinded to the study arm. Secondary aims were to assess the relationship of the study arm to resident-physician sleep duration, work hours and neurobehavioral performance. Results: The study involved 6577 patients with a total of 38,821 patient days (n = 18,749 EDWR, n = 20,072 RCWR). There were 413 resident-physician rotations included in the study (n = 203 EDWR, n = 210 RCWR). Resident-physician questionnaire data were over 95% complete. Conclusions: Results from data collected in the ROSTERS study will be evaluated for the impact of resident-physician schedule roster on patient safety outcomes in PICUs, and will allow for examination of a number of secondary outcome measures. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02134847 © 2019 Elsevier Inc.

Item Type: Article
Authors :
NameEmailORCID
Blackwell, T.
Kriesel, D.R.
Vittinghoff, E.
O'Brien, C.S.
Sullivan, J.P.
Viyaran, N.C.
Rahman, S.A.
Lockley, S.W.s.lockley@surrey.ac.uk
Barger, L.K.
Halbower, A.C.
Poynter, S.E.
Wright, K.P.
Yu, P.L.
Zee, P.C.
Landrigan, C.P.
Czeisler, C.A.
Stone, K.L.
Date : 2019
DOI : 10.1016/j.cct.2019.03.005
Uncontrolled Keywords : Medical errors, Patient safety, Pediatric intensive care unit, Randomized, Sleep, Work hours, adult, article, comparative effectiveness, controlled study, crossover procedure, drug safety, female, human, major clinical study, male, medical education, medical error, outcome assessment, patient safety, pediatric intensive care unit, questionnaire, randomized controlled trial, resident, rotation, single blind procedure, sleep time, university hospital
Depositing User : Clive Harris
Date Deposited : 17 Jun 2020 00:46
Last Modified : 17 Jun 2020 00:46
URI: http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/id/eprint/857818

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year


Information about this web site

© The University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
+44 (0)1483 300800