University of Surrey

Test tubes in the lab Research in the ATI Dance Research

Fluid Response Evaluation in Sepsis Hypotension and Shock: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Douglas, Ivor S., Alpat, Phillip M., Corl, Keith A., Exline, Matthew C., Forni, Lui, Holder, Andre L., Kaufman, David A., Khan, Akram, Levy, Mitchell M., Martin, Gregory S. , Sahatjian, Jennifer A., Seeley, Eric, Self, Wesley H., Weingarten, Jeremy A., Williams, Mark and Hansell, Douglas M. (2020) Fluid Response Evaluation in Sepsis Hypotension and Shock: A Randomized Clinical Trial Chest.

[img] Text
Fluid Response Evaluation in Sepsis Hypotension and Shock- A Randomized Clinical Trial.pdf - Accepted version Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only until 3 April 2021.

Download (1MB)

Abstract

Background: Fluid and vasopressor management in septic shock remains controversial. In this randomized controlled trial, we evaluated the efficacy of dynamic measures (stroke volume change during passive leg raise) to guide resuscitation and improve patient outcome. Research Question: Will resuscitation guided by dynamic assessments of fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock improve patient outcomes? Study Design and Methods: Prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial at 13 hospitals in the United States and United Kingdom. Patients presented to Emergency Rooms with sepsis associated hypotension and anticipated Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission. Intervention arm patients were assessed for fluid responsiveness before clinically driven fluid bolus or increase in vasopressors. The protocol included reassessment and therapy as indicated by the PLR result. The control arm received Usual Care. Primary clinical outcome was positive fluid balance at 72 hours or ICU discharge, whichever occurred first. Results: In modified-ITT (mITT) analysis including 83 Intervention and 41 Usual Care eligible patients, fluid balance at 72 hours or ICU discharge was significantly lower (-1.37L favoring Intervention arm, 0.65 ± 2.85L Intervention arm vs. 2.02 ± 3.44L Usual Care arm, p=0.021. Fewer patients required renal replacement therapy (5.1% vs 17.5%, p=0.04) or mechanical ventilation (17.7% vs 34.1%, p=0.04) in the Intervention arm compared to Usual Care. In the allrandomized Intent to Treat (ITT) population (102 Intervention, 48 Usual Care) there were no significant differences in safety signals. Interpretation: Physiologically informed fluid and vasopressor resuscitation using passive leg raise-induced stroke volume change to guide management of septic shock is safe and demonstrated lower net fluid balance and reductions in the risk of renal and respiratory failure. Dynamic assessments to guide fluid administration may improve outcomes for septic shock patients compared with Usual Care. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02837731

Item Type: Article
Divisions : Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences > School of Biosciences and Medicine > Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Authors :
NameEmailORCID
Douglas, Ivor S.
Alpat, Phillip M.
Corl, Keith A.
Exline, Matthew C.
Forni, Luil.forni@surrey.ac.uk
Holder, Andre L.
Kaufman, David A.
Khan, Akram
Levy, Mitchell M.
Martin, Gregory S.
Sahatjian, Jennifer A.
Seeley, Eric
Self, Wesley H.
Weingarten, Jeremy A.
Williams, Mark
Hansell, Douglas M.
Date : 2 April 2020
Funders : Cheetah Medical
DOI : 10.1016/j.chest.2020.04.025
Copyright Disclaimer : Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Depositing User : James Marshall
Date Deposited : 29 May 2020 10:25
Last Modified : 29 May 2020 10:25
URI: http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/id/eprint/857003

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year


Information about this web site

© The University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
+44 (0)1483 300800