University of Surrey

Test tubes in the lab Research in the ATI Dance Research

Understanding the (non-)use of societal wellbeing indicators in national policy development: What can we learn from civil servants? A UK case study

Corlet Walker, Christine, Druckman, Angela and Cattaneo, Claudio (2020) Understanding the (non-)use of societal wellbeing indicators in national policy development: What can we learn from civil servants? A UK case study Social Indicators Research.

[img] Text
Q Study Manuscript_SocIndRes_revisions round 1_v7.docx - Accepted version Manuscript

Download (218kB)

Abstract

Gross Domestic Product is often used as a proxy for societal well-being in the context of policy development. Its shortcomings in this context are, however, well documented and numerous alternative indicator sets have been developed. Despite this, there is limited evidence of widespread use of these alternative indicator sets by people working in policy areas relevant to societal wellbeing. Civil servants are an important group of indicator end-users, and better understanding their views about measuring societal wellbeing may contribute to broader discussions of what factors determine indicator use and influence in policy decision-making. Taking the UK as a case study, we ask: what views exist among civil servants in the UK about measuring societal well-being? To answer this question, we used a bootstrapped Q methodology, interviewing 20 civil servants to elicit their views about measuring societal well-being. Three distinct discourses emerged from our analysis: one that was concerned about the consequences of ignoring natural, social and human capital in decision making; one that emphasised opportunity and autonomy as key determinants of well-being; and one that focused on the technical aspects of measuring societal well-being. Each of these discourses has direct implications for the way that we integrate societal wellbeing into policy making, and highlights the potential benefits of including end-users in indicator development and strategy, more broadly.

Item Type: Article
Divisions : Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences > Centre for Environment and Sustainability
Authors :
NameEmailORCID
Corlet Walker, Christinec.corlet@surrey.ac.uk
Druckman, AngelaA.Druckman@surrey.ac.uk
Cattaneo, Claudio
Date : 16 March 2020
Funders : South East Network for Social Sciences (SENSS)
Uncontrolled Keywords : societal well-being; beyond GDP; social indicators; ecological indicators; Q methodology
Depositing User : James Marshall
Date Deposited : 18 Mar 2020 13:46
Last Modified : 18 Mar 2020 13:46
URI: http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/id/eprint/853950

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year


Information about this web site

© The University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
+44 (0)1483 300800