University of Surrey

Test tubes in the lab Research in the ATI Dance Research

Clinical validation of the RTVue optical coherence tomography angiography image quality indicators

Ali, Noha, Sampson, Danuta M., Au Yong, Alex, Jeewa, Rumaanah, Rajgopal, Saumya, Dutt, Deepaysh D. C. S., Mohamed, Sharaf, Mohamed, Shehata, Menghini, Moreno, Hansen, Alex and Chen, Fred K. (2019) Clinical validation of the RTVue optical coherence tomography angiography image quality indicators Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology.

[img] Text
Clinical validation of the RTVue optical coherence tomography angiography image quality indicators.pdf - Accepted version Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only until 10 November 2020.

Download (4MB)

Abstract

Importance

All automated image quality indicators for en face optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) images require gold standard validation for determining optimum thresholds.

Background

A manual grading system (gold standard) for OCTA images was validated and compared to two automated image quality indicators: signal strength index (SSI) and scan quality index (SQI) generated by different software versions of the Optovue OCTA device.

Design

Retrospective cross‐sectional study.

Participants

A total of 52 eyes of 52 healthy individual and 77 eyes of 51 patients with retinal vascular diseases.

Methods

A total of 129 OCTA images of the superficial vascular plexus were graded manually by three independent examiners. Each image was assigned grades 1 to 4 (1‐2, unacceptable; 3‐4, acceptable) masked to the software‐generated quality indicators.

Main Outcome Measures

Inter‐grader agreement and comparison of the utility of SSI and SQI in discriminating between acceptable and unacceptable OCTA images.

Results

There was a substantial agreement between the three graders (κ = 0.63). Mean SSI and SQI was significantly different between acceptable and unacceptable images (P ˂ .001). SQI outperformed SSI in separating acceptable from unacceptable images (areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.87 vs 0.80) and the optimum cut‐off was ≥7 for SQI and ≥70 for SSI for acceptable images. Up to 30% of images with quality indicators reaching the optimum SQI and SSI cut‐off thresholds still had unacceptable quality on manual grading. Unacceptable images were found in 33% and 66% of healthy and diseased eyes, respectively.

Conclusions and Relevance

SQI is closely related to manual grading but we caution reliance on the optimized threshold to determine image quality. SQI is superior to SSI in discriminating between acceptable and unacceptable images.

Item Type: Article
Divisions : Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences > Electronic Engineering
Authors :
NameEmailORCID
Ali, Noha
Sampson, Danuta M.danuta.sampson@surrey.ac.uk
Au Yong, Alex
Jeewa, Rumaanah
Rajgopal, Saumya
Dutt, Deepaysh D. C. S.
Mohamed, Sharaf
Mohamed, Shehata
Menghini, Moreno
Hansen, Alex
Chen, Fred K.
Date : 26 November 2019
DOI : 10.1111/ceo.13680
Copyright Disclaimer : © 2019 Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists
Uncontrolled Keywords : Grading system; Image quality; Optical coherence tomography angiography; Retinal angiography; Retinal vascular disease
Depositing User : Clive Harris
Date Deposited : 09 Dec 2019 09:09
Last Modified : 09 Dec 2019 09:09
URI: http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/id/eprint/853241

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year


Information about this web site

© The University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
+44 (0)1483 300800