University of Surrey

Test tubes in the lab Research in the ATI Dance Research

A multidisciplinary consensus on dehydration: definitions, diagnostic methods and clinical implications

Lacey, J., Corbett, J., Forni, Lui, Hooper, L., Hughes, F., Minto, G., Moss, C., Price, S., Whyte, G., Woodcock, T. , Mythen, M. and Montgomery, H. (2019) A multidisciplinary consensus on dehydration: definitions, diagnostic methods and clinical implications Annals of Medicine, 51 (3-4). pp. 232-251.

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Background

Dehydration appears prevalent, costly and associated with adverse outcomes. We sought to generate consensus on such key issues and elucidate need for further scientific enquiry.

Materials and methods:

A modified Delphi process combined expert opinion and evidence appraisal. Twelve relevant experts addressed dehydration’s definition, objective markers and impact on physiology and outcome.

Results:

Fifteen consensus statements and seven research recommendations were generated. Key findings, evidenced in detail, were that there is no universally accepted definition for dehydration; hydration assessment is complex and requires combining physiological and laboratory variables; “dehydration” and “hypovolaemia” are incorrectly used interchangeably; abnormal hydration status includes relative and/or absolute abnormalities in body water and serum/plasma osmolality (pOsm); raised pOsm usually indicates dehydration; direct measurement of pOsm is the gold standard for determining dehydration; pOsm >300 and ≤280 mOsm/kg classifies a person as hyper or hypo-osmolar; outside extremes, signs of adult dehydration are subtle and unreliable; dehydration is common in hospitals and care homes and associated with poorer outcomes.

Discussion:

Dehydration poses risk to public health. Dehydration is under-recognized and poorly managed in hospital and community-based care. Further research is required to improve assessment and management of dehydration and the authors have made recommendations to focus academic endeavours.

•Key messages

•Dehydration assessment is a major clinical challenge due to a complex, varying pathophysiology, non-specific clinical presentations and the lack of international consensus on definition and diagnosis.

•Plasma osmolality represents a valuable, objective surrogate marker of hypertonic dehydration which is underutilized in clinical practice.

•Dehydration is prevalent within the healthcare setting and in the community, and appears associated with increased morbidity and mortality.

Item Type: Article
Divisions : Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences > School of Health Sciences
Authors :
NameEmailORCID
Lacey, J.
Corbett, J.
Forni, Luil.forni@surrey.ac.uk
Hooper, L.
Hughes, F.
Minto, G.
Moss, C.
Price, S.
Whyte, G.
Woodcock, T.
Mythen, M.
Montgomery, H.
Date : 17 June 2019
DOI : 10.1080/07853890.2019.1628352
Copyright Disclaimer : Copyright © 2019 Informa UK Limited
Uncontrolled Keywords : Dehydration; Osmolar concentration; Body fluid compartments; Consensus; Body water; Water–electrolyte balance
Depositing User : Diane Maxfield
Date Deposited : 28 Oct 2019 12:17
Last Modified : 28 Oct 2019 12:17
URI: http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/id/eprint/852702

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year


Information about this web site

© The University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
+44 (0)1483 300800