University of Surrey

Test tubes in the lab Research in the ATI Dance Research

3D laparoscopy does not reduce operative duration or errors in day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial

Schwab, Katie E., Curtis, Nathan J., Whyte, Martin B., Smith, Ralph V., Rockall, Timothy A., Ballard, Karen and Jourdan, Iain C. (2019) 3D laparoscopy does not reduce operative duration or errors in day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial Surgical Endoscopy.

[img]
Preview
Text
3D laparoscopy does not reduce operative duration or errors.pdf - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (673kB) | Preview

Abstract

Background

Contemporary 3D platforms have overcome past deficiencies. Available trainee and laboratory studies suggest stereoscopic imaging improves performance but there is little clinical data or studies assessing specialists. We aimed to determine whether stereoscopic (3D) laparoscopic systems reduce operative time and number of intraoperative errors during specialist-performed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

Methods

A parallel arm (1:1) randomised controlled trial comparing 2D and 3D passive-polarised laparoscopic systems in day-case LC using was performed. Eleven consultant surgeons that had each performed ˃ 200 LC (including ˃ 10 3D LC) participated. Cases were video recorded and a four-point difficulty grade applied. The primary outcome was overall operative time. Subtask time and the number of intraoperative consequential errors as identified by two blinded assessors using a hierarchical task analysis and the observational clinical human reliability analysis technique formed secondary endpoints.

Results

112 patients were randomised. There was no difference in operative time between 2D and 3D LC (23:14 min (± 10:52) vs. 20:17 (± 9:10), absolute difference − 14.6%, p = 0.148) although 3D surgery was significantly quicker in difficulty grade 3 and 4 cases (30:23 min (± 9:24), vs. 18:02 (± 7:56), p ˂ 0.001). No differences in overall error count was seen (total 47, median 1, range 0–4 vs. 45, 1, 0–3, p = 0.62) although there were significantly fewer 3D gallbladder perforations (15 vs. 6, p = 0.034).

Conclusion

3D laparoscopy did not reduce overall operative time or error frequency in laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed by specialist surgeons. 3D reduced Calot’s dissection time and operative time in complex cases as well as the incidence of iatrogenic gallbladder perforation (NCT01930344).

Item Type: Article
Divisions : Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences > School of Biosciences and Medicine
Authors :
NameEmailORCID
Schwab, Katie E.k.schwab@surrey.ac.uk
Curtis, Nathan J.
Whyte, Martin B.m.b.whyte@surrey.ac.uk
Smith, Ralph V.
Rockall, Timothy A.
Ballard, KarenK.Ballard@surrey.ac.uk
Jourdan, Iain C.
Date : 16 July 2019
DOI : 10.1007/s00464-019-06961-1
Copyright Disclaimer : © The Author(s) 2019. Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Uncontrolled Keywords : 3D; Three-dimensional; Laparoscopic; Cholecystectomy; Gallbladder; Trial
Depositing User : Clive Harris
Date Deposited : 09 Sep 2019 13:38
Last Modified : 25 Sep 2019 07:32
URI: http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/id/eprint/852587

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year


Information about this web site

© The University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
+44 (0)1483 300800