University of Surrey

Test tubes in the lab Research in the ATI Dance Research

Do parental shame-proneness, perfectionism and beliefs about children’s emotions predict inductive and power assertive parenting styles? An empirical study.

Lloyd, Louise V. G. (2019) Do parental shame-proneness, perfectionism and beliefs about children’s emotions predict inductive and power assertive parenting styles? An empirical study. Doctoral thesis, University of Surrey.

[img] Text
E-Thesis - LL.docx - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (1MB)

Abstract

Parental responses to transgressions are a mechanism through which self-conscious emotions and social competence are socialised in children. Evidence indicates that inductive parenting is more effective than power assertive parenting in the development of child social competence. Given variation in parental discipline responses, this study examined predictors of the use of these parenting styles. The present study investigated parental shame-proneness, parental perfectionism, and parental acceptance of children’s expression of emotions as predictors of a predominantly inductive or power assertive parenting style. Sixty-nine mothers of typically developing children aged between 5 to 11 years completed an online study. A scenario-based measure of parenting responses to child transgression allowed for the categorisation of mothers into those with a predominantly inductive parenting style and those with a predominantly power assertive parenting style. Measures of mothers’ shame-proneness, perfectionism, and beliefs about children’s emotional expression included the Test of Self-Conscious Affect (TOSCA), the Almost Perfect Scale – Revised (APS-R), and the Parental Beliefs About Children’s Emotions (PBACE) questionnaire. Binary logistic regression analyses found a five-predictor model to be significantly better than a constant only model at predicting a predominantly inductive or power assertive parenting style. The five predictors in the model were parental shame-proneness, parental perfectionistic standards (adaptive perfectionism), parental acceptance of children’s expression of positive emotions, mothers’ level of education, and number of children in the family. The importance of considering these parental predictor variables, particularly shame-proneness, in the development of parenting interventions is discussed.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Divisions : Theses
Authors : Lloyd, Louise V. G.
Date : 30 September 2019
Funders : NHS Surrey & Borders (University of Surrey)
DOI : 10.15126/thesis.00852515
Contributors :
ContributionNameEmailORCID
http://www.loc.gov/loc.terms/relators/THSSimonds, LauraL.Simonds@surrey.ac.uk
http://www.loc.gov/loc.terms/relators/THSTenenbaum, Harrieth.tenenbaum@surrey.ac.uk
Depositing User : Louise Lloyd
Date Deposited : 03 Oct 2019 08:42
Last Modified : 03 Oct 2019 08:44
URI: http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/id/eprint/852515

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year


Information about this web site

© The University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
+44 (0)1483 300800