University of Surrey

Test tubes in the lab Research in the ATI Dance Research

A comparison of linear regression, regularization, and machine learning algorithms to develop Europe-wide spatial models of fine particles and nitrogen dioxide

Chen, Jie, de Hoogh, Kees, Gulliver, John, Hoffmann, Barbara, Hertel, Ole, Ketzel, Matthias, Bauwelinck, Mariska, van Donkelaar, Aaron, Hvidtfeldt, Ulla A., Katsouyanni, Klea , Janssen, Nicole A.H., Martin, Randall V., Samoli, Evangelia, Schwartz, Per E., Stafoggia, Massimo, Bellander, Tom, Strak, Maciek, Wolf, Kathrin, Vienneau, Danielle, Vermeulen, Roel, Brunekreef, Bert and Hoek, Gerard (2019) A comparison of linear regression, regularization, and machine learning algorithms to develop Europe-wide spatial models of fine particles and nitrogen dioxide Environment International, 130, 104934.

[img]
Preview
Text
A comparison of linear regression, regularization, and machine learning algorithms.pdf - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

Empirical spatial air pollution models have been applied extensively to assess exposure in epidemiological studies with increasingly sophisticated and complex statistical algorithms beyond ordinary linear regression. However, different algorithms have rarely been compared in terms of their predictive ability.

This study compared 16 algorithms to predict annual average fine particle (PM2.5) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) concentrations across Europe. The evaluated algorithms included linear stepwise regression, regularization techniques and machine learning methods. Air pollution models were developed based on the 2010 routine monitoring data from the AIRBASE dataset maintained by the European Environmental Agency (543 sites for PM2.5 and 2399 sites for NO2), using satellite observations, dispersion model estimates and land use variables as predictors. We compared the models by performing five-fold cross-validation (CV) and by external validation (EV) using annual average concentrations measured at 416 (PM2.5) and 1396 sites (NO2) from the ESCAPE study. We further assessed the correlations between predictions by each pair of algorithms at the ESCAPE sites.

For PM2.5, the models performed similarly across algorithms with a mean CV R² of 0.59 and a mean EV R² of 0.53. Generalized boosted machine, random forest and bagging performed best (CV R²~0.63; EV R² 0.58–0.61), while backward stepwise linear regression, support vector regression and artificial neural network performed less well (CV R² 0.48–0.57; EV R² 0.39–0.46). Most of the PM2.5 model predictions at ESCAPE sites were highly correlated (R² > 0.85, with the exception of predictions from the artificial neural network). For NO2, the models performed even more similarly across different algorithms, with CV R²s ranging from 0.57 to 0.62, and EV R²s ranging from 0.49 to 0.51. The predicted concentrations from all algorithms at ESCAPE sites were highly correlated (R² > 0.9). For both pollutants, biases were low for all models except the artificial neural network. Dispersion model estimates and satellite observations were two of the most important predictors for PM2.5 models whilst dispersion model estimates and traffic variables were most important for NO2 models in all algorithms that allow assessment of the importance of variables.

Different statistical algorithms performed similarly when modelling spatial variation in annual average air pollution concentrations using a large number of training sites.

Item Type: Article
Divisions : Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences > Civil and Environmental Engineering
Authors :
NameEmailORCID
Chen, Jie
de Hoogh, Kees
Gulliver, John
Hoffmann, Barbara
Hertel, Ole
Ketzel, Matthiasm.ketzel@surrey.ac.uk
Bauwelinck, Mariska
van Donkelaar, Aaron
Hvidtfeldt, Ulla A.
Katsouyanni, Klea
Janssen, Nicole A.H.
Martin, Randall V.
Samoli, Evangelia
Schwartz, Per E.
Stafoggia, Massimo
Bellander, Tom
Strak, Maciek
Wolf, Kathrin
Vienneau, Danielle
Vermeulen, Roel
Brunekreef, Bert
Hoek, Gerard
Date : September 2019
DOI : 10.1016/j.envint.2019.104934
Copyright Disclaimer : © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY-NC-ND/4.0/).
Uncontrolled Keywords : Land use regression; Fine particles; Nitrogen dioxide; Machine learning
Depositing User : Clive Harris
Date Deposited : 08 Jul 2019 12:22
Last Modified : 08 Jul 2019 12:22
URI: http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/id/eprint/852219

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year


Information about this web site

© The University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
+44 (0)1483 300800