University of Surrey

Test tubes in the lab Research in the ATI Dance Research

Barriers to bowel scope (flexible sigmoidoscopy) screening: A comparison of non-responders, active decliners and non-attenders 11 Medical and Health Sciences 1117 Public Health and Health Services

Von Wagner, Christian, Bonello, Bernadette, Stoffel, Sandro, Skrobanski, Hanna, Freeman, Madeleine, Kerrison, Robert S. and McGregor, Lesley M. (2018) Barriers to bowel scope (flexible sigmoidoscopy) screening: A comparison of non-responders, active decliners and non-attenders 11 Medical and Health Sciences 1117 Public Health and Health Services BMC Public Health, 18 (1).

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Background Participation in bowel scope screening (BSS) is low (43%), limiting its potential to reduce colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality. This study aimed to quantify the prevalence of barriers to BSS and examine the extent to which these barriers differed according to non-participant profiles: non-responders to the BSS invitation, active decliners of the invitation, and non-attenders of confirmed appointments. Methods Individuals invited for BSS between March 2013 and December 2015, across 28 General Practices in England, were sent a questionnaire. Questions measured initial interest in BSS, engagement with the information booklet, BSS participation, and, where applicable, reasons for BSS non-attendance. Chi-square tests of independence were performed to examine the relationship between barriers, non-participant groups and socio-demographic variables. Results 1478 (45.8%) questionnaires were returned for analysis: 1230 (83.2%) attended screening, 114 (7.7%) were non-responders to the BSS invitation, 100 (6.8%) were active decliners, and 34 (2.3%) were non-attenders. Non-responders were less likely to have read the whole information booklet than active decliners (x2 (2, N = 157) = 7.00, p = 0.008) and non-attenders (x2 (2, N = 101) = 8.07, p = 0.005). Non-responders also had lower initial interest in having BSS than either active decliners (x2 (2, N = 213) = 6.07, p = 0.014) or non-attenders (x2 (2, N = 146) = 32.93, p < 0.001). Overall, anticipated pain (33%) and embarrassment (30%) were the most commonly cited barriers to BSS participation. For non-attenders, however, practical, appointment-related reasons were most common (27%). Conclusions Interventions to improve BSS uptake should be more nuanced and use targeted strategies to address the specific needs of each group.

Item Type: Article
Divisions : Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences > School of Health Sciences
Authors :
NameEmailORCID
Von Wagner, Christian
Bonello, Bernadette
Stoffel, Sandro
Skrobanski, Hannah.skrobanski@surrey.ac.uk
Freeman, Madeleine
Kerrison, Robert S.
McGregor, Lesley M.
Date : 5 October 2018
Funders : Cancer Research UK
DOI : 10.1186/s12889-018-6071-8
Copyright Disclaimer : © The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Uncontrolled Keywords : Bowel scope, Colorectal cancer, Flexible sigmoidoscopy, Non-attendance, Screening
Depositing User : Diane Maxfield
Date Deposited : 26 Jun 2019 14:24
Last Modified : 26 Jun 2019 14:25
URI: http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/id/eprint/852093

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year


Information about this web site

© The University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
+44 (0)1483 300800