University of Surrey

Test tubes in the lab Research in the ATI Dance Research

Divided attention, selective attention and drawing: Processing preferences in Williams syndrome are dependent on the task administered

Farran, Emily K, Jarrold, Christopher and Gathercole, Susan E. (2003) Divided attention, selective attention and drawing: Processing preferences in Williams syndrome are dependent on the task administered NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 41 (6, PII). pp. 676-687.

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

The visuo-spatial abilities of individuals with Williams syndrome (WS) have consistently been shown to be generally weak. These poor visuo-spatial abilities have been ascribed to a local processing bias by some [R. Rossen, E.S. Klima, U. Bellugi, A. Bihrle, W. Jones, Interaction between language and cognition: evidence from Williams syndrome, in: J. Beitchman, N. Cohen, M. Konstantareas, R. Tannock (Eds.), Language, Learning and Behaviour disorders: Developmental, Behavioural and Clinical Perspectives, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1996, pp. 367–392] and conversely, to a global processing bias by others [Psychol. Sci. 10 (1999) 453]. In this study, two identification versions and one drawing version of the Navon hierarchical processing task, a non-verbal task, were employed to investigate this apparent contradiction. The two identification tasks were administered to 21 individuals with WS, 21 typically developing individuals, matched by non-verbal ability, and 21 adult participants matched to the WS group by mean chronological age (CA). The third, drawing task was administered to the WS group and the typically developing (TD) controls only. It was hypothesised that the WS group would show differential processing biases depending on the type of processing the task was measuring. Results from two identification versions of the Navon task measuring divided and selective attention showed that the WS group experienced equal interference from global to local as from local to global levels, and did not show an advantage of one level over another. This pattern of performance was broadly comparable to that of the control groups. The third task, a drawing version of the Navon task, revealed that individuals with WS were significantly better at drawing the local form in comparison to the global figure, whereas the typically developing control group did not show a bias towards either level. In summary, this study demonstrates that individuals with WS do not have a local or a global processing bias when asked to identify stimuli, but do show a local bias in their drawing abilities. This contrast may explain the apparently contrasting findings from previous studies.

Item Type: Article
Divisions : Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences > School of Psychology
Authors :
NameEmailORCID
Farran, Emily Ke.farran@surrey.ac.uk
Jarrold, Christopher
Gathercole, Susan E.
Date : 1 January 2003
Funders : The Williams Syndrome Foundation of the UK
DOI : 10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00219-1
Copyright Disclaimer : © 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved
Uncontrolled Keywords : Hierarchical processing; Local–global; Visuo-spatial perception; Drawing ability
Depositing User : Diane Maxfield
Date Deposited : 01 Jul 2019 11:29
Last Modified : 01 Jul 2019 11:29
URI: http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/id/eprint/850258

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year


Information about this web site

© The University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
+44 (0)1483 300800