University of Surrey

Test tubes in the lab Research in the ATI Dance Research

Commemorating history and communicating hope : a mixed-methods study on how political leaders construct who ‘we’ and ‘they’ have been or can become in public ceremonial communication.

Gkinopoulos, Theofilos (2019) Commemorating history and communicating hope : a mixed-methods study on how political leaders construct who ‘we’ and ‘they’ have been or can become in public ceremonial communication. Doctoral thesis, University of Surrey.

[img] Text
THESIS REPOSITORY.docx - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (319kB)

Abstract

The present thesis aims to understand the ways that political leaders craft a sense of ‘us’ and ‘them’ as part of their identity entrepreneurship process. The social psychological literature of entrepreneurial identity is underpinned by some problematic assumptions that limit understanding of the meaning, formation and influence of social identity in action. Political leaders as entrepreneurs are presented or treated as a homogeneous group in terms of the embodied properties and powers related to the entire nation, which they govern or aim to do so, rather than as representatives of a uniquely embodied political group. Therefore, findings of the present thesis build on the literature of social identity approach to political leadership in two ways: First, by suggesting concrete hypotheses about how leaders with different amounts of political support might define in various ways, as identity entrepreneurs, who ‘we’ are and who ‘we’ are not in democratic contexts marked by stability or crisis. Second, by considering different temporal accounts, in the form of who ‘we’ or ‘they’ were (past), are (present) or can become (future), as social identity maintenance strategies employed by political leaders. In Chapter 1, I introduce the thesis, set the scene, list the research questions that this thesis aims to answer and provide a chapter-by-chapter break down framework. In Chapter 2, I summarise previous work on commemoration practice alongside research on social identity approach to political leadership and studies beyond the social identity approach to leadership that focus on group identities and discourses of ‘we’ and ‘they’. In Chapter 3, I present the methodological framework of analysis of commemorative political speeches. Chapters 4 (content analysis), 5 (discourse analysis of ‘we’ and ‘they’) and 6 (temporal positioning of ‘we’ and ‘they’) present the findings of analysis of the speeches. I conclude, in this thesis, with a discussion, where I summarise findings, address implications of the current research and propose directions for future research.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Divisions : Theses
Authors :
NameEmailORCID
Gkinopoulos, Theofilos
Date : 28 February 2019
Funders : None funded
DOI : 10.15126/thesis.00850162
Contributors :
ContributionNameEmailORCID
http://www.loc.gov/loc.terms/relators/THSHegarty, PeterP.Hegarty@surrey.ac.uk
http://www.loc.gov/loc.terms/relators/THSLeRoux-Rutledge, Emilye.leroux-rutledge@surrey.ac.uk
Depositing User : Theofilos Gkinopoulos
Date Deposited : 07 Mar 2019 12:25
Last Modified : 07 Mar 2019 12:26
URI: http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/id/eprint/850162

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year


Information about this web site

© The University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
+44 (0)1483 300800