University of Surrey

Test tubes in the lab Research in the ATI Dance Research

Online eLearning for undergraduates in health professions: A systematic review of the impact on knowledge, skills, attitudes and satisfaction.

George, Pradeep Paul, Papachristou, Nikos, Belisario, José Marcano, Wang, Wei, Wark, Petra A, Cotic, Ziva, Rasmussen, Kristine, Sluiter, René, Riboli–Sasco, Eva, Car, Lorainne Tudor , Musulanov, Eve Marie, Molina, Joseph Antonio, Heng, Bee Hoon, Zhang, Yanfeng, Wheeler, Erica Lynette, Al Shorbaji, Najeeb, Majeed, Azeem and Car, Josip (2014) Online eLearning for undergraduates in health professions: A systematic review of the impact on knowledge, skills, attitudes and satisfaction. Journal of Global Health, 4 (1).

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Background

Health systems worldwide are facing shortages in health professional workforce. Several studies have demonstrated the direct correlation between the availability of health workers, coverage of health services, and population health outcomes. To address this shortage, online eLearning is increasingly being adopted in health professionals’ education. To inform policy–making, in online eLearning, we need to determine its effectiveness.

Methods

We performed a systematic review of the effectiveness of online eLearning through a comprehensive search of the major databases for randomised controlled trials that compared online eLearning to traditional learning or alternative learning methods. The search period was from January 2000 to August 2013. We included articles which primarily focused on students' knowledge, skills, satisfaction and attitudes toward eLearning and cost-effectiveness and adverse effects as secondary outcomes. Two reviewers independently extracted data from the included studies. Due to significant heterogeneity among the included studies, we presented our results as a narrative synthesis.

Findings

Fifty–nine studies, including 6750 students enrolled in medicine, dentistry, nursing, physical therapy and pharmacy studies, met the inclusion criteria. Twelve of the 50 studies testing knowledge gains found significantly higher gains in the online eLearning intervention groups compared to traditional learning, whereas 27 did not detect significant differences or found mixed results. Eleven studies did not test for differences. Six studies detected significantly higher skill gains in the online eLearning intervention groups, whilst 3 other studies testing skill gains did not detect differences between groups and 1 study showed mixed results. Twelve studies tested students' attitudes, of which 8 studies showed no differences in attitudes or preferences for online eLearning. Students' satisfaction was measured in 29 studies, 4 studies showed higher satisfaction for online eLearning and 20 studies showed no difference in satisfaction between online eLearning and traditional learning. Risk of bias was high for several of the included studies.

Conclusion

The current evidence base suggests that online eLearning is equivalent, possibly superior to traditional learning. These findings present a potential incentive for policy makers to cautiously encourage its adoption, while respecting the heterogeneity among the studies.

Item Type: Article
Divisions : Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences > School of Health Sciences
Authors :
NameEmailORCID
George, Pradeep Paul
Papachristou, Nikos
Belisario, José Marcanoj.marcano-belisario@surrey.ac.uk
Wang, Wei
Wark, Petra A
Cotic, Ziva
Rasmussen, Kristine
Sluiter, René
Riboli–Sasco, Eva
Car, Lorainne Tudor
Musulanov, Eve Marie
Molina, Joseph Antonio
Heng, Bee Hoon
Zhang, Yanfeng
Wheeler, Erica Lynette
Al Shorbaji, Najeeb
Majeed, Azeem
Car, Josip
Date : June 2014
DOI : 10.7189/jogh.04.010406
Copyright Disclaimer : © 2014 by the Journal of Global Health. All rights reserved. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Depositing User : Diane Maxfield
Date Deposited : 16 Jan 2019 13:01
Last Modified : 12 Feb 2019 15:29
URI: http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/id/eprint/850155

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year


Information about this web site

© The University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
+44 (0)1483 300800