University of Surrey

Test tubes in the lab Research in the ATI Dance Research

Re-conceptualizing the Role of Science in International Trade Disputes

Du, Michael (2018) Re-conceptualizing the Role of Science in International Trade Disputes Journal of World Trade, 52 (5). pp. 697-720.

[img] Text
Reconceptualising Science in Trade Disputes.docx - Accepted version Manuscript

Download (97kB)


Science has been traditionally characterized as an objective discipline that is free of values and which leads to definitive knowledge. In the GATT/WTO system, science has been elevated as the ultimate arbiter of international trade disputes. This article intends to critically evaluate, and re-conceptualize, the role of science in distinguishing disguised trade protectionism and legitimate government regulation. Drawing insights from psychology and behavioral science, the article first sets forth two normative principles that should be followed where science is to be used as an arbiter in trade disputes. It then proceeds to examine to what extent the current WTO case law has deviated from these normative principles. The article concludes that WTO Members enjoy wide discretion to address pervasive scientific uncertainty. Nevertheless, it remains possible that a rigorous use of science will bring WTO rules into direct conflict with national democracy in some highly value-laden and politically sensitive disputes.

Item Type: Article
Divisions : Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences > School of Law
Authors :
Date : 2018
Copyright Disclaimer : Copyright 2018 Kluwer Law International. Reprinted from Journal of World Trade, Volume 52, No. 5, 2018, pp 697-720, with permission of Kluwer Law International.
Depositing User : Melanie Hughes
Date Deposited : 26 Apr 2018 11:19
Last Modified : 01 Dec 2018 02:08

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item


Downloads per month over past year

Information about this web site

© The University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
+44 (0)1483 300800