University of Surrey

Test tubes in the lab Research in the ATI Dance Research

A new duress defence and the theory of understandable compliance.

Elkington, Amy (2018) A new duress defence and the theory of understandable compliance. Doctoral thesis, University of Surrey.

[img] Text
Thesis Final.docx - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (547kB)

Abstract

Duress is a common law defence that has existed since at least the 13th century. It was initially used for the most heinous crime, treason, when a defendant was forced to act against his will. It has since developed to become heavily restricted and excluded to murder. This thesis considers the theoretical underpinnings of duress and questions why an excusatory defence duress does not operate to excuse all crimes, especially as no aims of sentencing are served by punishing the defendant. By researching the historical foundations of duress, considering reform proposals and drawing comparisons to other jurisdictions, it will be concluded that there is no basis for denying duress to murder and that allowing the defence to murder operates successfully in other common law jurisdictions. A new underpinning theory of duress, called understandable compliance, will be proposed. This will acknowledge that when the defendant is faced with a threat of death the law should not expect him to act heroically (or even reasonably), but instead afford a defence when the defendant’s actions are a normatively understandable compliance to the threat. This new duress defence will provide the defendant with a full acquittal, except for when the defendant has committed murder or manslaughter. When the defendant has killed another his right to justice must be weighed against the sanctity of human life and the need to declare killing as unacceptable. Instead of the current position, which would convict the defendant as a murderer or manslaughterer, the defendant would be convicted of a lesser offence of killing under duress with a restricted maximum sentence. This will result in those deserving of compassion having a defence of duress available to them, discretion in sentencing for murder, and the correct label for those convicted when killing under duress.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Divisions : Theses
Authors :
NameEmailORCID
Elkington, AmyUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Date : 31 January 2018
Funders : Self -funded
Contributors :
ContributionNameEmailORCID
http://www.loc.gov/loc.terms/relators/THSSarch, Alexandera.sarch@surrey.ac.ukUNSPECIFIED
http://www.loc.gov/loc.terms/relators/THSFinch, EmilyE.Finch@surrey.ac.ukUNSPECIFIED
Depositing User : Amy Elkington
Date Deposited : 01 Feb 2018 08:31
Last Modified : 01 Feb 2018 08:31
URI: http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/id/eprint/845551

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year


Information about this web site

© The University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
+44 (0)1483 300800