University of Surrey

Test tubes in the lab Research in the ATI Dance Research

Minds, Brains, and Norms

Pardo, Michael S. and Patterson, Dennis (2010) Minds, Brains, and Norms Neuroethics, 4 (3). pp. 179-190.

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Arguments for the importance of neuroscience reach across many disciplines. Advocates of neuroscience have made wide-ranging claims for neuroscience in the realms of ethics, value, and law. In law, for example, many scholars have argued for an increased role for neuroscientific evidence in the assessment of criminal responsibility. In this article, we take up claims for the explanatory role of neuroscience in matters of morals and law. Drawing on our previous work together, we assess the cogency of neuroscientific explanations of three issues that arise in these domains: rule-following, interpretation, and knowledge. We critique these explanations and in general challenge claims as to the efficacy of the neuroscientific accounts.

Item Type: Article
Divisions : Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences > School of Law
Authors :
NameEmailORCID
Pardo, Michael S.
Patterson, Dennisd.patterson@surrey.ac.uk
Date : 19 June 2010
Identification Number : 10.1007/s12152-010-9082-4
Copyright Disclaimer : © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010
Uncontrolled Keywords : Rule-following Interpretation Knowledge Ethics Morals Mens rea Insanity Lie detection Deception
Depositing User : Karen Garland
Date Deposited : 12 Dec 2017 10:00
Last Modified : 12 Dec 2017 10:00
URI: http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/id/eprint/845208

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year


Information about this web site

© The University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
+44 (0)1483 300800