University of Surrey

Test tubes in the lab Research in the ATI Dance Research

Philosophy, Neuroscience and Law: The Conceptual and Empirical, Rule-Following, Interpretation and Knowledge

Patterson, Dennis and Pardo, Michael S. (2014) Philosophy, Neuroscience and Law: The Conceptual and Empirical, Rule-Following, Interpretation and Knowledge In: Problems of Normativity, Rules and Rule-Following. Law and Philosophy Library book series (111). Springer, Cham, pp. 177-188. ISBN 978-3-319-09375-8

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

The intersection between law and neuroscience is one of the most-discussed subfields in legal scholarship. In this article, we consider fundamental issues in the field. These include: the distinction between the conceptual and the empirical, rule-following, and the nature of knowledge. We maintain that the conceptual issues are fundamental to all aspects of this enterprise.

Item Type: Book Section
Divisions : Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences > School of Law
Authors :
NameEmailORCID
Patterson, Dennisd.patterson@surrey.ac.uk
Pardo, Michael S.
Editors :
NameEmailORCID
Araszkiewicz, M.
Banaś, P.
Gizbert-Studnicki, T.
Płeszka, K.
Date : 8 November 2014
Identification Number : 10.1007/978-3-319-09375-8_13
Copyright Disclaimer : © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015
Uncontrolled Keywords : Neuroscience Rule-following Conceptual Empirical Analytic Philosophy
Depositing User : Karen Garland
Date Deposited : 07 Dec 2017 15:01
Last Modified : 07 Dec 2017 15:01
URI: http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/id/eprint/845159

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year


Information about this web site

© The University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
+44 (0)1483 300800