University of Surrey

Test tubes in the lab Research in the ATI Dance Research

A study of capital structure in the U.K. hotel and retail industries.

Nuri, Julinda. (2000) A study of capital structure in the U.K. hotel and retail industries. Doctoral thesis, University of Surrey (United Kingdom)..

Full text is not currently available. Please contact sriopenaccess@surrey.ac.uk, should you require it.

Abstract

Modigliani and Miller's (1958) irrelevance theory established the foundations of capital structure theory. They showed that, in a capital market free of taxes, transaction costs, asymmetric information, and other frictions, the value of the firm is independent of its capital structure choice. Most of the capital structure theory development that followed tested the irrelevance theory with more realistic assumptions regarding market frictions and information asymmetries. The vast amount of empirical research into the extent and effects of bankruptcy costs and taxes on capital structure, as well as cross-industry and cross-country examination of observed capital structure, led to the mainstream view that firms act as if there is a unique, optimal capital structure that results from the tradeoff between tax and agency cost benefits of increased debt use and the increased bankruptcy and agency costs that higher levels of debt entail. As an alternative to the trade-off model, Myers (1977) put forward the Pecking Order hypothesis of capital gearing. This states that because of information asymmetry and different stock market reactions to debt and equity issues, firms follow a "pecking order" in their financing decisions, i.e. they would first prefer to use internal funds rather than issuing securities. If forced to resort to external financing they would use debt before equity. Section one of this study undertakes a comprehensive review of the theoretical literature on capital structure to date, emphasising those theories that are more pertinent to the empirical study carried out in section two. Another school of thought which tries to explain the use of debt is transaction cost economics (Williamson, 1975, 1996), which sees debt and equity as two governance mechanisms, the choice between which is strongly dependent on asset specificity. Empirical tests are carried out in this study using regression analysis to try to establish whether the capital structure of firms in the UK hotel and retail industries is better explained by a pecking order model or by a target adjustment model. The last chapter presents an empirical analysis of different variables that are likely to influence the observed capital structure patterns. This panel data analysis assesses the role of size, earnings volatility, profitability, asset structure, non-debt tax shields, leasing and management contract (this latter is specific to the hotel industry) variables on gearing ratios. The conclusions of the empirical study are that the industry data analysed are much better explained by the target adjustment model than the pecking order model. However, a number of independent variables appear to contribute to the "target adjustment effect" and the debt tax shield is just one of them.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Divisions : Theses
Authors :
NameEmailORCID
Nuri, Julinda.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Date : 2000
Contributors :
ContributionNameEmailORCID
http://www.loc.gov/loc.terms/relators/THSUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Depositing User : EPrints Services
Date Deposited : 09 Nov 2017 12:16
Last Modified : 09 Nov 2017 14:45
URI: http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/id/eprint/844069

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year


Information about this web site

© The University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
+44 (0)1483 300800