University of Surrey

Test tubes in the lab Research in the ATI Dance Research

The speech of men and women in contemporary French: The function of parenthetical remarks and the pragmatic particles c'est-a-dire, enfin, hein and quoi.

Beeching, Kate. (2001) The speech of men and women in contemporary French: The function of parenthetical remarks and the pragmatic particles c'est-a-dire, enfin, hein and quoi. Doctoral thesis, University of Surrey (United Kingdom)..

[img]
Preview
Text
10130402.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (27MB) | Preview

Abstract

This thesis sets out to test Lakoff's (1975) hypothesis that women's speech is more polite or tentative than men's through a detailed analysis of the usage, in a sample of contemporary spoken French, of parenthetical remarks (PRs) and the pragmatic particles (PPs) c'est-a-dire, enfin, hein and quoi. PRs and PPs serve both the repair requirements and the social interactional 'face-work' which are characteristic of spontaneous speech. Qualitative and quantitative investigations were conducted on the seventeen-hour corpus of orthographically-transcribed spontaneous speech. The aim of the qualitative analysis was to evaluate the contextual factors which may motivate the use of PRs and PPs. The quantitative analysis, by contrast, set out to measure the distributional frequencies of their usage according to the sex, age and educational background of the speakers. Whilst the detailed exploration of contingent factors such as the social roles adopted by the speakers demonstrates the value of a qualitative account, the fact that it is possible to make generalisable or falsifiable pronouncements on the basis of results found to be statistically significant in the data legitimises the adoption of a quantitative account. Both qualitative and quantitative analyses presume a prior sub-categorisation of the pragmatic usages of the linguistic item under investigation. The thesis arrives at the conclusion that, if men's and women's usage of PRs and PPs differs in the corpus, the asymmetry lies not in the degree of tentativeness displayed but rather in the use made of such expressions to introduce explanatory ramification and to mediate repair, both of which are favoured to a greater extent by the male speakers in our corpus. If the female speakers display greater politeness, it lies in their more adroit usage of the PPs to structure discourse and to maintain contact with their interlocutor.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Divisions : Theses
Authors :
NameEmailORCID
Beeching, Kate.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Date : 2001
Contributors :
ContributionNameEmailORCID
http://www.loc.gov/loc.terms/relators/THSUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Depositing User : EPrints Services
Date Deposited : 09 Nov 2017 12:11
Last Modified : 13 Nov 2017 22:04
URI: http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/id/eprint/842827

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year


Information about this web site

© The University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
+44 (0)1483 300800