University of Surrey

Test tubes in the lab Research in the ATI Dance Research

BSE and Food Safety Regulation: A Comparison of UK and German Approaches

Beck, M., Kewell, Elizabeth and Asenova, D (2007) BSE and Food Safety Regulation: A Comparison of UK and German Approaches In: ESRC Risk and Rationalities Conference 2007, 29-31 Mar 2007, Cambridge, UK.

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

The BSE crisis represents one of the worst policy disasters experienced by a UK government in recent years. In material terms, it led to the slaughter of 3.3 million cattle and an estimated economic loss of £3.7 billion. In administrative terms, the crisis led to the dissolution of the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (MAFF), an institution that was heavily criticised by the Phillips Inquiry for its lack of openness and transparency. Although far less severe in terms of its economic impact, with estimated losses of between Euro 0.8 and 1.05 billion, the German BSE crisis resulted in extensive political fallout, leading, inter alia, to the resignation of two government ministers. This paper compares the handling of the crisis in the UK and Germany and the regulation put in place in its aftermath. It explores the reasons for the failure of both governments to manage this crisis in a credible, timely and proactive fashion. Examining the institutional contexts in which decisions about scientific evidence on BSE were made, the paper argues that, in both countries, a centralised system, in which government agencies controlled “science for government”, was vulnerable to expert-interest group alliances which undermined the potential for a credible assessment of public health and safety risks. Looking at the policies adopted in the aftermath of these crises, the paper notes that, although being far less affected by BSE, Germany paradoxically adopted far more rigorous measures for the prevention of future incidents, which included the strict administrative separation of the risk assessment and management functions. Our paper concludes that the extent of administrative reforms which are initiated in response to crises is more likely to correspond to that general receptiveness of the political environment to these reforms, than the ‘objective’ impact of the crisis itself.

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (Conference Paper)
Divisions : Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences > Surrey Business School
Authors :
NameEmailORCID
Beck, M.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Kewell, Elizabethe.kewell@surrey.ac.ukUNSPECIFIED
Asenova, DUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Date : 29 March 2007
Uncontrolled Keywords : Accountability; BSE; Expert Judgement; Mismanagement; Phillips Inquiry; Risk Assessment; Risk Management; Risk Communication
Depositing User : Clive Harris
Date Deposited : 30 May 2017 10:21
Last Modified : 30 May 2017 10:21
URI: http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/id/eprint/841218

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year


Information about this web site

© The University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
+44 (0)1483 300800