University of Surrey

Test tubes in the lab Research in the ATI Dance Research

A meta-analysis on farm-level costs and benefits of GM crops

Finger, R, El Benni, N, Kaphengst, T, Evans, C, Herbert, S, Lehmann, B, Morse, S and Stupak, N (2011) A meta-analysis on farm-level costs and benefits of GM crops Sustainability, 3 (5). pp. 743-762.

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

This paper reviews the evidence on the socio-economic impacts of GM crops and analyzes whether there are patterns across space and time. To this end, we investigate the effect of GM crops on farm-level costs and benefits using global data from more than one decade of field trials and surveys. More specifically, we analyze the effects of GM-crops on crop yields, seed costs, pesticide costs, and management and labor costs and finally gross margins. Based on collected data from studies on Bt cotton and Bt maize, statistical analyses are conducted to estimate the effect of GM crop adoption on these parameters. Our results show that, compared to conventional crops, GM crops can lead to yield increases and can lead to reductions in the costs of pesticide application, whereas seed costs are usually substantially higher. Thus, the results presented here do support the contention that the adoption of GM crops leads on average to a higher economic performance, which is also underlined by the high adoption rates for GM crops in a number of countries. However, the kind and magnitude of benefits from GM crops are very heterogeneous between countries and regions, particularly due to differences in pest pressure and pest management practices. Countries with poor pest management practices benefited most from a reduction in yield losses, whereas other countries benefited from cost reductions. However, our study also reveals limitations for meta-analyses on farm-level costs and benefits of GM crops. In particular, published data are skewed towards some countries and the employed individual studies rely on different assumptions, purposes and methodologies (e.g., surveys and field trials). Furthermore, a summary of several (often) short-term individual studies may not necessarily capture long-term effects of GM crop adoption.

Item Type: Article
Authors :
NameEmailORCID
Finger, RUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
El Benni, NUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Kaphengst, TUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Evans, CUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Herbert, SUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Lehmann, BUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Morse, Ss.morse@surrey.ac.ukUNSPECIFIED
Stupak, NUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Date : 2011
Identification Number : https://doi.org/10.3390/su3050743
Depositing User : Symplectic Elements
Date Deposited : 17 May 2017 12:11
Last Modified : 17 May 2017 15:02
URI: http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/id/eprint/834382

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year


Information about this web site

© The University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
+44 (0)1483 300800