University of Surrey

Test tubes in the lab Research in the ATI Dance Research

The UK vs Sweden: Is the NHS really so bad?

Lazaridis, EN, Gavalova, L, Jones, S, Quinn, T and Weston, C (2014) The UK vs Sweden: Is the NHS really so bad? PeerJ.

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Sheng-Chia Chung and colleagues report in The Lancet (23 January 2014) an international comparison of cardiovascular patient mortality between the UK and Sweden. They suggest that “more than 10000 deaths at 30 days would have been prevented or delayed had UK patients experienced the care of their Swedish counterparts.” Further, they estimate that 1741 deaths would have been prevented in the UK had the Swedish pattern of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and beta-blocker use been replicated in the NHS from 2004 to 2010. However, their study does not provide convincing evidence that faster uptake of primary PCI or beta-blockers on discharge would have had an effect on cardiovascular patient mortality in the UK.

Item Type: Article
Authors :
NameEmailORCID
Lazaridis, ENUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Gavalova, LUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Jones, Ssimonjones@surrey.ac.ukUNSPECIFIED
Quinn, Tt.quinn@surrey.ac.ukUNSPECIFIED
Weston, CUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Date : 21 February 2014
Identification Number : https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.253v1
Related URLs :
Depositing User : Symplectic Elements
Date Deposited : 17 May 2017 10:09
Last Modified : 17 May 2017 14:47
URI: http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/id/eprint/826595

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year


Information about this web site

© The University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
+44 (0)1483 300800