University of Surrey

Test tubes in the lab Research in the ATI Dance Research

An evaluation of wild bird avian influenza surveillance in Great Britain.

Breed, AC, Irvine, RM, Duncan, D, Rae, D, Snow, L, Cook, AJ and Brown, IH (2012) An evaluation of wild bird avian influenza surveillance in Great Britain. Avian Dis, 56 (4 Supp). pp. 986-991.

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

This study presents a method for evaluation of surveillance for avian influenza (AI) in wild birds and compares surveillance activities before and after changes in surveillance strategy in Great Britain (GB). In October 2008 the AI Wild Bird Surveillance (AIWBS) system in GB was modified to focus on passive surveillance (birds found dead), including those found during warden patrols of wetlands and wildlife reserves, with less emphasis on public reporting of birds found dead. The number of birds sampled by active surveillance (birds live-trapped or shot) was also reduced. In the present study the impact of these changes was investigated by comparing the 12 mo prior to October 2008 with the subsequent 12 mo. Four factors were considered for each surveillance system component: 1) the number of wild birds tested; 2) whether the tested wild birds were considered "higher risk species" (HRS) for being infected with AI; 3) the location of the birds tested with respect to counties designated as a priority for surveillance; and 4) the probability that the birds tested might yield a positive AI virus result based on surveillance results in wild birds across Europe. The number of birds tested by both surveillance types was greatly reduced after the strategy change. The proportion of birds sampled in priority counties also significantly decreased in the second year for both active and passive surveillance. However, the proportion of HRS sampled by active surveillance significantly increased, while a significant decrease in these species was seen for passive surveillance in the second year. The derived probability scores for detecting AI based on European surveillance results indicated a reduction in sensitivity for H5N1 highly pathogenic AI detection by passive surveillance. The methods developed to evaluate AIWBS in GB may be applicable to other European Union countries. The results also reflect the complex issues associated with evaluation of disease surveillance in wildlife populations in which the disease ecology is only partially understood.

Item Type: Article
Authors :
NameEmailORCID
Breed, ACUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Irvine, RMUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Duncan, DUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Rae, DUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Snow, LUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Cook, AJalasdair.j.cook@surrey.ac.ukUNSPECIFIED
Brown, IHUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Date : December 2012
Identification Number : 10.1637/10166-040912-Reg.1
Uncontrolled Keywords : Animals, Animals, Wild, Birds, Great Britain, Influenza in Birds, Population Surveillance, Time Factors
Related URLs :
Depositing User : Symplectic Elements
Date Deposited : 17 May 2017 09:50
Last Modified : 17 May 2017 14:45
URI: http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/id/eprint/825335

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year


Information about this web site

© The University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
+44 (0)1483 300800