University of Surrey

Test tubes in the lab Research in the ATI Dance Research

Accounting for non-annuitization

Pashchenko, S (2013) Accounting for non-annuitization Journal of Public Economics, 98. pp. 53-67.

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Why don't people buy annuities? Several explanations have been provided by the previous literature: large fraction of preannuitized wealth in retirees' portfolios; adverse selection; bequest motives; and medical expense uncertainty. This paper uses a quantitative model to assess the importance of these impediments to annuitization and also studies three newer explanations: government safety net in terms of means-tested transfers; illiquidity of housing wealth; and restrictions on minimum amount of investment in annuities. This paper shows that quantitatively four explanations play a big role in reducing annuity demand: preannuitized wealth, minimum annuity purchase requirement, illiquidity of housing wealth, and bequest motives. The annuity purchase involves big upfront investment, especially if there is a minimum purchase restriction. This is binding for many, especially if housing is illiquid and part of wealth is preannuitized. While bequest motives significantly reduce the overall annuity demand, the model with a strong bequest motive cannot match the empirical fact that high-income people have the highest demand for annuities. © 2012 Elsevier B.V.

Item Type: Article
Authors :
NameEmailORCID
Pashchenko, Ss.pashchenko@surrey.ac.ukUNSPECIFIED
Date : 1 February 2013
Identification Number : 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.11.005
Depositing User : Symplectic Elements
Date Deposited : 16 May 2017 15:31
Last Modified : 16 May 2017 15:31
URI: http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/id/eprint/820200

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year


Information about this web site

© The University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
+44 (0)1483 300800