University of Surrey

Test tubes in the lab Research in the ATI Dance Research

Quality of life in the first 6 weeks following laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery

Dowson, HM, Rockall, TA, Ballard, K, Gage, H, Jackson, D and Williams, P (2013) Quality of life in the first 6 weeks following laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery Value in Health, 16 (2). pp. 367-372.

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Objectives: Evidence of how health-related quality of life (HRQOL) changes following laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery in the first 6 weeks of postoperative recovery is needed to inform cost-effectiveness evaluations. Methods: Pragmatic prospective cohort study design. Consecutive patients requiring elective colorectal surgery were allocated to either laparoscopic or open surgery by administrative staff in a district general hospital in England, 2006-2007. Patients completed two validated, generic measures of HRQOL at baseline (preoperatively) and on multiple occasions in the first 6 weeks postsurgery using diaries (EuroQol five-dimensional [EQ-5D] questionnaire: 16 times; short-form 36 health survey [SF-36]: 4 times; HRQOL was compared between groups at each time point, and overall using repeated-measures analysis. Results: Of 201 consecutive patients recruited, 32 (15.1%) were unable to complete diaries. Of the remaining 169 patients, 120 (71%) returned completed diaries at 28 days and 105 (62.1%) at 42 days. There was no difference in preoperative HRQOL scores between surgical groups, but the postoperative EQ-5D questionnaire and SF-36 scores were significantly higher in the laparoscopic group (EQ-5D questionnaire P = 0.005, SF-36 P = 0.007). Subgroup analysis showed that patients with a stoma have worse HRQOL than those without. HRQOL did not differ between the laparoscopic and open stoma patients. Conclusions: This study presents unique prospective data demonstrating that laparoscopic surgery confers HRQOL benefits for patients in the early recovery period following colorectal surgery, compared with open surgery. Consideration of these data in the context of a cost-effectiveness analysis will be reported separately. © 2013 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR).

Item Type: Article
Authors :
NameEmailORCID
Dowson, HMUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Rockall, TAUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Ballard, Kk.ballard@surrey.ac.ukUNSPECIFIED
Gage, Hh.gage@surrey.ac.ukUNSPECIFIED
Jackson, Dd.jackson@surrey.ac.ukUNSPECIFIED
Williams, Pp.williams@surrey.ac.ukUNSPECIFIED
Date : March 2013
Identification Number : 10.1016/j.jval.2012.11.005
Depositing User : Symplectic Elements
Date Deposited : 16 May 2017 15:19
Last Modified : 17 May 2017 14:33
URI: http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/id/eprint/818771

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year


Information about this web site

© The University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
+44 (0)1483 300800