University of Surrey

Test tubes in the lab Research in the ATI Dance Research

Tournaments with midterm reviews

Gershkov, A and Perry, M (2009) Tournaments with midterm reviews Games and Economic Behavior, 66 (1). pp. 162-190.

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

In many tournaments investments are made over time. The question whether to conduct a review once at the end, or additionally at points midway through the tournament, is a strategic decision. If the latter course is chosen, then the designer must establish both a rule for aggregating the results of the different reviews and a rule for determining compensations. We first study the case of a fixed, exogenously given prize and then extend the analysis to the case where the prize is not fixed but may vary with the tournament's outcome. It is shown that (1) it is always optimal to assign a higher weight to the final review; (2) this weight increases with the dominance of the first-stage effort in determining the final review's outcome. When the prize is not fixed, the optimal design generates an asymmetric tournament in the second stage that favors the winner of the midterm review.

Item Type: Article
Authors :
NameEmailORCID
Gershkov, Aa.gershkov@surrey.ac.ukUNSPECIFIED
Perry, MUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Date : May 2009
Identification Number : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2008.04.003
Depositing User : Symplectic Elements
Date Deposited : 16 May 2017 15:14
Last Modified : 17 May 2017 14:33
URI: http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/id/eprint/818256

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year


Information about this web site

© The University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
+44 (0)1483 300800