University of Surrey

Test tubes in the lab Research in the ATI Dance Research

Three Problems of Retaliation: A Comparative Study.

Connolly, MJ Three Problems of Retaliation: A Comparative Study. In: Academy of Legal Studies in Business, 86th Annual Conference, 2011-08-09 - 2011-08-09, , New Orleans, USA.

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

In the UK and the United States, anti-discrimination law prohibits disparate treatment and disparate impact, on protected grounds, such as race, sex, etc. Workers who use the legislation, or assist others to do so, need protection against retaliation by their employer. Accordingly, the legislation seeks to remove deterrents by creating a fourth instance of discrimination, known as retaliation. The statutory formula is limited, apparently providing employers no defence (see e.g. EEOC v Board of Governors of State Colleges and Universities and University Professionals of Illinois (957 F 2d 424 (7th Cir 1992)). Yet in some cases, courts sympathetic to the employer have strained the formula to provide what amounts to a benign motive defence (e.g. US v New York City Transit Authority 97 F 3d 672 (2nd Cir 1996)). The result is an incoherent body of case law. This paper explores the problem in Britain and the United States, and attempts to settle upon a new statutory formula that would provide certainty and clarity, as well as fulfilling the ambition of the anti-retaliation doctrine.

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED)
Authors :
NameEmailORCID
Connolly, MJm.connolly@surrey.ac.ukUNSPECIFIED
Depositing User : Symplectic Elements
Date Deposited : 16 May 2017 15:10
Last Modified : 17 May 2017 14:32
URI: http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/id/eprint/817774

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year


Information about this web site

© The University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
+44 (0)1483 300800