University of Surrey

Test tubes in the lab Research in the ATI Dance Research

Developing a Collaborative Agenda for Humanities and Social Scientific Research on Laboratory Animal Science and Welfare

Davies, GF, Greenhough, BJ, Hobson-West, P, Kirk, RGW, Applebee, K, Bellingan, LC, Berdoy, M, Buller, H, Cassaday, HJ, Davies, K , Diefenbacher, D, Druglitro, T, Escobar, MP, Friese, C, Herrmann, K, Hinterberger, A, Jarrett, WJ, Jayne, K, Johnson, AM, Johnson, ER, Konold, T, Leach, MC, Leonelli, S, Lewis, DI, Lilley, EJ, Longridge, ER, McLeod, CM, Miele, M, Nelson, NC, Ormandy, EH, Pallett, H, Poort, L, Pound, P, Ramsden, E, Roe, E, Scalway, H, Schrader, A, Scotton, CJ, Scudamore, CL, Smith, JA, Whitfield, L and Wolfensohn, Sarah (2016) Developing a Collaborative Agenda for Humanities and Social Scientific Research on Laboratory Animal Science and Welfare PLOS ONE, 11 (7), e0158791.

[img]
Preview
Text
PLOS ONE 2016.pdf - Version of Record
Available under License : See the attached licence file.

Download (167kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
PDF (licence)
SRI_deposit_agreement.pdf
Available under License : See the attached licence file.

Download (33kB) | Preview

Abstract

Improving laboratory animal science and welfare requires both new scientific research and insights from research in the humanities and social sciences. Whilst scientific research provides evidence to replace, reduce and refine procedures involving laboratory animals (the ‘3Rs’), work in the humanities and social sciences can help understand the social, economic and cultural processes that enhance or impede humane ways of knowing and working with laboratory animals. However, communication across these disciplinary perspectives is currently limited, and they design research programmes, generate results, engage users, and seek to influence policy in different ways. To facilitate dialogue and future research at this interface, we convened an interdisciplinary group of 45 life scientists, social scientists, humanities scholars, non-governmental organisations and policy-makers to generate a collaborative research agenda. This drew on methods employed by other agenda-setting exercises in science policy, using a collaborative and deliberative approach for the identification of research priorities. Participants were recruited from across the community, invited to submit research questions and vote on their priorities. They then met at an interactive workshop in the UK, discussed all 136 questions submitted, and collectively defined the 30 most important issues for the group. The output is a collaborative future agenda for research in the humanities and social sciences on laboratory animal science and welfare. The questions indicate a demand for new research in the humanities and social sciences to inform emerging discussions and priorities on the governance and practice of laboratory animal research, including on issues around: international harmonisation, openness and public engagement, ‘cultures of care’, harm-benefit analysis and the future of the 3Rs. The process outlined below underlines the value of interdisciplinary exchange for improving communication across different research cultures and identifies ways of enhancing the effectiveness of future research at the interface between the humanities, social sciences, science and science policy.

Item Type: Article
Subjects : Veterinary Medicine
Divisions : Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences > School of Veterinary Medicine
Authors :
NameEmailORCID
Davies, GFUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Greenhough, BJUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Hobson-West, PUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Kirk, RGWUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Applebee, KUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Bellingan, LCUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Berdoy, MUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Buller, HUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Cassaday, HJUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Davies, KUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Diefenbacher, DUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Druglitro, TUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Escobar, MPUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Friese, CUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Herrmann, KUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Hinterberger, AUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Jarrett, WJUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Jayne, KUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Johnson, AMUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Johnson, ERUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Konold, TUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Leach, MCUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Leonelli, SUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Lewis, DIUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Lilley, EJUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Longridge, ERUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
McLeod, CMUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Miele, MUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Nelson, NCUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Ormandy, EHUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Pallett, HUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Poort, LUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Pound, PUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Ramsden, EUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Roe, EUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Scalway, HUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Schrader, AUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Scotton, CJUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Scudamore, CLUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Smith, JAUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Whitfield, LUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Wolfensohn, Sarahs.wolfensohn@surrey.ac.ukUNSPECIFIED
Date : 18 July 2016
Identification Number : 10.1371/journal.pone.0158791
Copyright Disclaimer : © 2016 Davies et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Uncontrolled Keywords : Science & Technology, Multidisciplinary Sciences, Science & Technology - Other Topics, TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, CARE, 3RS, INTERDISCIPLINARITY, BIOSCIENCE, QUESTIONS, DECISIONS, STANDARDS, SUPPORT, DESIGN
Related URLs :
Depositing User : Symplectic Elements
Date Deposited : 22 Mar 2017 15:34
Last Modified : 19 Jul 2017 13:36
URI: http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/id/eprint/813826

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year


Information about this web site

© The University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
+44 (0)1483 300800