University of Surrey

Test tubes in the lab Research in the ATI Dance Research

Jogee: Jury Directions and the Manslaughter Alternative

Baker, D (2017) Jogee: Jury Directions and the Manslaughter Alternative Criminal Law Review, 1. pp. 51-56.

[img] Text
Letter to the Editor W.docx - Accepted version Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only until 31 January 2018.
Available under License : See the attached licence file.

Download (19kB)
[img]
Preview
Text (licence)
SRI_deposit_agreement.pdf
Available under License : See the attached licence file.

Download (33kB) | Preview

Abstract

Replies to the article by David Ormerod and Karl Laird entitled "Jogee: not the end of a legal saga but the start of one?", Crim. L.R. 2016, 8, 539-552, by assessing the impact of the Supreme Court ruling in R. v Jogee (Ameen Hassan) on jury directions in joint enterprise cases, including with regard to the defendant's: (1) intention to encourage the perpetrator's actual crime; and (2) manslaughter liability where the collateral crime was murder.

Item Type: Article
Subjects : Law
Divisions : Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences > School of Law
Authors :
NameEmailORCID
Baker, DUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Date : 2017
Copyright Disclaimer : This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Criminal Law Review following peer review. The definitive published version Baker, D Jogee: Jury Directions and the Manslaughter AlternativeCrim. L.R. 2017, 1, 51-56 is available online on Westlaw UK or from Thomson Reuters DocDel service.
Related URLs :
Depositing User : Symplectic Elements
Date Deposited : 28 Nov 2016 11:41
Last Modified : 31 Oct 2017 18:58
URI: http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/id/eprint/812966

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year


Information about this web site

© The University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
+44 (0)1483 300800