University of Surrey

Test tubes in the lab Research in the ATI Dance Research

The Taxing Power after Sebelius

Bogenschneider, B (2016) The Taxing Power after Sebelius Wake Forest Law Review.

[img] Text
The Taxing Power after Sebelius_v3.docx - Accepted version Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License : See the attached licence file.

Download (131kB)
[img]
Preview
Text (licence)
SRI_deposit_agreement.pdf
Available under License : See the attached licence file.

Download (33kB) | Preview

Abstract

The Constitutional framework for the taxing power is coherent. The prior reference in the literature to a “flaw” in the apportionment of income taxes is an ancillary issue. A Summary Table of the Taxing Power is provided here with examples that differentiate various tax levy methods from tax types. The individual mandate penalty at issue in Sebelius is categorized as a “capitation”-type tax. A Federal capitation tax is barred by Article 1, Section 2. The mention of capitation taxes in Section 9 merely clarifies that direct taxes must be apportioned according to the Census. The mandated purchase of insurance is also a new category of “tax” separate from the penalty. Following the holding in Sebelius, future cases will be needed to further clarify the limits of the taxing power. Given the trend in tax policy toward increased rates of Federal taxation of wage earnings, the issue of whether the Congressional taxing power is solely a matter of Federalism or whether taxes levied on persons also limit individual liberty is likely to be of major significance going forward. Since the Affordable Care Act did not provide specifics on the penalty qua tax, many of the details were left to the Internal Revenue Service to determine in practice, albeit with some restrictions placed on its method of collections. If history is any guide, the Internal Revenue Service is unlikely to administer the mandate in a way that safeguards individual liberty.

Item Type: Article
Subjects : Law
Divisions : Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences > School of Law
Authors :
AuthorsEmailORCID
Bogenschneider, BUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Date : 5 October 2016
Copyright Disclaimer : Copyright 2016 Wake Forest University School of Law
Related URLs :
Depositing User : Symplectic Elements
Date Deposited : 01 Sep 2016 10:43
Last Modified : 01 Sep 2016 10:43
URI: http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/id/eprint/811832

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year


Information about this web site

© The University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
+44 (0)1483 300800