University of Surrey

Test tubes in the lab Research in the ATI Dance Research

Impact of a hospice rapid response service on preferred place of death, and costs

Gage, Heather, Holdsworth, LM, Flannery, C, Williams, P and Butler, C (2015) Impact of a hospice rapid response service on preferred place of death, and costs BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 14, ARTN 75.

Impact of a hospice rapid response service on preferred place of death, and costs..pdf - Version of Record
Available under License : See the attached licence file.

Download (853kB) | Preview
Text (licence)
Available under License : See the attached licence file.

Download (33kB) | Preview


Background Many people with a terminal illness would prefer to die at home. A new palliative rapid response service (RRS) provided by a large hospice provider in South East England was evaluated (2010) to provide evidence of impact on achieving preferred place of death and costs. The RRS was delivered by a team of trained health care assistants and available 24/7. The purpose of this study was to (i) compare the characteristics of RRS users and non-users, (ii) explore differences in the proportions of users and non-users dying in the place of their choice, (iii) monitor the whole system service utilisation of users and non-users, and compare costs. Methods All hospice patients who died with a preferred place of death recorded during an 18 month period were included. Data (demographic, preferences for place of death) were obtained from hospice records. Dying in preferred place was modelled using stepwise logistic regression analysis. Service use data (period between referral to hospice and death) were obtained from general practitioners, community providers, hospitals, social services, hospice, and costs calculated using validated national tariffs. Results Of 688 patients referred to the hospice when the RRS was operational, 247 (35.9 %) used it. Higher proportions of RRS users than non-users lived in their own homes with a co-resident carer (40.3 % vs. 23.7 %); more non-users lived alone or in residential care (58.8 % vs. 76.3 %). Chances of dying in the preferred place were enhanced 2.1 times by being a RRS user, compared to a non-user, and 1.5 times by having a co-resident carer, compared to living at home alone or in a care home. Total service costs did not differ between users and non-users, except when referred to hospice very close to death (users had higher costs). Conclusions Use of the RRS was associated with increased likelihood of dying in the preferred place. The RRS is cost neutral.

Item Type: Article
Subjects : Economics
Divisions : Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences > School of Economics
Authors :
Holdsworth, LM
Flannery, C
Williams, P
Butler, C
Date : 23 December 2015
DOI : 10.1186/s12904-015-0065-4
Copyright Disclaimer : © Gage et al. 2015. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Uncontrolled Keywords : Science & Technology, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Health Care Sciences & Services, Health Policy & Services, Preferred place of death, Rapid response service, Costs, RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL, PALLIATIVE CARE, CANCER-PATIENTS, HOME, COMMUNITY, LIFE, END
Related URLs :
Depositing User : Symplectic Elements
Date Deposited : 10 Aug 2016 09:36
Last Modified : 31 Jul 2018 16:30

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item


Downloads per month over past year

Information about this web site

© The University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
+44 (0)1483 300800