University of Surrey

Test tubes in the lab Research in the ATI Dance Research

Assent for children's participation in research: why it matters and making it meaningful.

Oulton, K, Gibson, F, Sell, D, Williams, A, Pratt, L and Wray, J (2016) Assent for children's participation in research: why it matters and making it meaningful. Child: Care, Health and Development, 42 (4). pp. 588-597.

[img] Text
WebPage submission2016.pdf - Submitted Manuscript Under Review
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License : See the attached licence file.

Download (501kB)
[img]
Preview
Text (licence)
SRI_deposit_agreement.pdf
Available under License : See the attached licence file.

Download (33kB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are gaps in the existing evidence base about assent, with conflicting and unhelpful views prevalent. We contend that appropriate assent is a valuable process that has important consequences for children's/young people's participation in research. Furthermore, there is a need for a model to support researchers in making decisions about who to assent and how to do this is a meaningful way. METHODS: We undertook a scoping review of the literature to assess the body of opinion on assent in research with children/young people. An anonymous online survey was conducted to gather views from the wider community undertaking research with children/young people. We also sought to gather examples of current and effective practice that could be shared beyond the level of a single institution and our own experience. Survey participants included 48 health professionals with varied levels of experience, all actively involved in research with children. RESULTS: Published work, the findings from the online survey and our knowledge as experienced researchers in the field have confirmed four domains that should be considered in order for assent to be meaningful and individualized: child-related factors, family dynamics, study design and complexity and researcher and organizational factors. Mapping these domains onto the three paradigm cases for decision-making around children and young people's assent/consent as recommended by the Nuffield Council on Bioethics has resulted in a model that will aid researchers in understanding the relationship between assent and consent and help them make decisions about when assent is appropriate. CONCLUSIONS: The debate about assent needs to move away from terminology, definition and legal issues. It should focus instead on practical ways of supporting researchers to work in partnership with children, thus ensuring a more informed, voluntary and more robust and longer lasting commitment to research.

Item Type: Article
Divisions : Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences > School of Health Sciences
Authors :
AuthorsEmailORCID
Oulton, KUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Gibson, FUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Sell, DUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Williams, AUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Pratt, LUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Wray, JUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Date : July 2016
Identification Number : 10.1111/cch.12344
Uncontrolled Keywords : assent, children, consent, research
Related URLs :
Depositing User : Symplectic Elements
Date Deposited : 15 Jul 2016 07:27
Last Modified : 15 Jul 2016 07:27
URI: http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/id/eprint/811228

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year


Information about this web site

© The University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
+44 (0)1483 300800