University of Surrey

Test tubes in the lab Research in the ATI Dance Research

Children's participation in shared decision-making: children, adolescents, parents and healthcare professionals' perspectives and experiences.

Coyne, I, Amory, A, Kiernan, G and Gibson, F (2014) Children's participation in shared decision-making: children, adolescents, parents and healthcare professionals' perspectives and experiences. Eur J Oncol Nurs, 18 (3). pp. 273-280.

WarningThere is a more recent version of this item available.
Text (licence)
Available under License : See the attached licence file.

Download (33kB) | Preview


PURPOSE OF THE RESEARCH: Despite decision-making featuring throughout the trajectory of cancer care, children's participation in decision-making remains an area much under-researched and complicated by conflicting opinions. This study explored children's participation in shared decision-making (SDM) from multiple perspectives from one haematology/oncology unit in Ireland. METHODS AND SAMPLE: Qualitative research design was used to explore participants' experiences of children's decision-making. Interviews were conducted with children(1) aged 7-16 years (n = 20), their parents (n = 22) and healthcare professionals (n = 40). Data were managed with the aid of NVivo (version 8). KEY RESULTS: Parents and children's roles in decision-making were significantly influenced by the seriousness of the illness. Cancer is a life-threatening illness and so the treatment 'had to be done'. Children were not involved in major decisions (treatment decisions) as refusal was not an option. They were generally involved in minor decisions (choices about care delivery) with the purpose of gaining their cooperation, making treatment more palatable, giving back a sense of control and building trusting relationships. These choices were termed 'small' decisions that would not compromise the child's welfare. Some adolescents were aware that choices were not 'real' decisions since they were not allowed to refuse and expressed feelings of frustration. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare professionals and parents controlled the process of SDM and the children's accounts revealed that they held a minimal role. Children appeared content that adults held responsibility for the major treatment decisions. However, they desired and valued receiving information, voicing their preferences and choosing how treatments were administered to them.

Item Type: Article
Subjects : Biosciences
Divisions : Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences > School of Biosciences and Medicine
Authors :
Coyne, I
Amory, A
Kiernan, G
Gibson, F
Date : June 2014
DOI : 10.1016/j.ejon.2014.01.006
Copyright Disclaimer : © 2014. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license
Uncontrolled Keywords : Cancer, Children, Healthcare professionals, Information, Interactions, Parent, Participation, Qualitative, Shared decision-making, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Ireland, Male, Neoplasms, Parent-Child Relations, Parents, Patient Participation, Professional-Patient Relations, Qualitative Research
Related URLs :
Additional Information : Full text not available from this repository.
Depositing User : Symplectic Elements
Date Deposited : 07 Jun 2016 14:15
Last Modified : 31 Oct 2017 18:22

Available Versions of this Item

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item


Downloads per month over past year

Information about this web site

© The University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
+44 (0)1483 300800