University of Surrey

Test tubes in the lab Research in the ATI Dance Research

Using routinely collected health data for surveillance, quality improvement and research: Framework and key questions to assess ethics, privacy and data access.

De Lusignan, S, Liyanage, H, Di Iorio, CT, Chan, T and Liaw, ST (2016) Using routinely collected health data for surveillance, quality improvement and research: Framework and key questions to assess ethics, privacy and data access. J Innov Health Inform, 22 (4). pp. 426-432.

[img]
Preview
Text
Using routinely collected health data for surveillance, quality improvement and research - Framework and key questions to assess ethics, privacy and data access.pdf - Version of Record
Available under License : See the attached licence file.

Download (1MB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
PDF (licence)
SRI_deposit_agreement.pdf
Available under License : See the attached licence file.

Download (33kB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of health data for public health, surveillance, quality improvement and research is crucial to improve health systems and health care. However, bodies responsible for privacy and ethics often limit access to routinely collected health data. Ethical approvals, issues around protecting privacy and data access are often dealt with by different layers of regulations, making approval processes appear disjointed. OBJECTIVE: To create a comprehensive framework for defining the ethical and privacy status of a project and for providing guidance on data access. METHOD: The framework comprises principles and related questions. The core of the framework will be built using standard terminology definitions such as ethics-related controlled vocabularies and regional directives. It is built in this way to reduce ambiguity between different definitions. The framework is extensible: principles can be retired or added to, as can their related questions. Responses to these questions should allow data processors to define ethical issues, privacy risk and other unintended consequences. RESULTS: The framework contains three steps: (1) identifying possible ethical and privacy principles relevant to the project; (2) providing ethics and privacy guidance questions that inform the type of approval needed; and (3) assessing case-specific ethics and privacy issues. The outputs from this process should inform whether the balance between public interests and privacy breach and any ethical considerations are tipped in favour of societal benefits. If they are then this should be the basis on which data access is permitted. Tightly linking ethical principles to governance and data access may help maintain public trust.

Item Type: Article
Subjects : Biosciences and medicine
Authors :
AuthorsEmailORCID
De Lusignan, SUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Liyanage, HUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Di Iorio, CTUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Chan, TUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Liaw, STUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Date : 19 January 2016
Identification Number : 10.14236/jhi.v22i4.845
Copyright Disclaimer : Copyright © 2015 The Author(s). Published by BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT under Creative Commons license http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0/
Related URLs :
Depositing User : Symplectic Elements
Date Deposited : 27 May 2016 13:47
Last Modified : 15 Nov 2016 11:36
URI: http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/id/eprint/810493

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year


Information about this web site

© The University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
+44 (0)1483 300800