University of Surrey

Test tubes in the lab Research in the ATI Dance Research

The Quality of Social Simulation: an Example from Research Policy Modelling

Gilbert, N and Ahrweiler, P (2015) The Quality of Social Simulation: an Example from Research Policy Modelling In: Policy Practice and Digital Science – Integrating Complex Systems, Social Simulation and Public Administration in Policy Research. Springer, pp. 35-55. ISBN 978-3-319-12783-5

[img] Text
Ahrweiler and Gilbert Quality in Social Simulation.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License : See the attached licence file.

Download (429kB)
[img]
Preview
Text (licence)
SRI_deposit_agreement.pdf
Available under License : See the attached licence file.

Download (33kB) | Preview

Abstract

This contribution deals with the assessment of the quality of a simulation. The first section points out the problems of the Standard View and the Constructivist View in evaluating social simulations. A simulation is good when we get from it what we originally would have liked to get from the target; in this, the evaluation of the simulation is guided by the expectations, anticipations and experience of the community that uses it. This makes the user community view the most promising mechanism to assess the quality of a policy modelling exercise. The second section looks at a concrete policy modelling example to test this idea. It shows that the very first negotiation and discussion with the user community to identify their questions is highly user-driven, interactive, and iterative. It requires communicative skills, patience, willingness to compromise on both sides, and motivation to make the formal world of modellers and the narrative world of practical policymaking meet. Often, the user community is involved in providing data for calibrating the model. It is not an easy issue to confirm the existence, quality and availability of data and check for formats and database requirements. As the quality of the simulation in the eyes of the user will very much depend on the quality of the informing data and the quality of the model calibration, much time and effort need to be spent in coordinating this issue with the user community. Last but not least, the user community has to check the validity of simulation results and has to believe in their quality. Users have to be enabled to understand the model, to agree with its processes and ways to produce results, to judge similarity between empirical and simulated data etc. Although the User Community view might be the most promising, it is the most work-intensive mechanism to assess the quality of a simulation. Summarising, to trust the quality of a simulation means to trust the process that produced its results. This process includes not only the design and construction of the simulation model itself, but also the whole interaction between stakeholders, study team, model, and findings.

Item Type: Book Section
Divisions : Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences > Department of Sociology
Authors :
AuthorsEmailORCID
Gilbert, NUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Ahrweiler, PUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Date : 4 June 2015
Related URLs :
Depositing User : Symplectic Elements
Date Deposited : 06 Jan 2016 13:00
Last Modified : 06 Jan 2016 13:00
URI: http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/id/eprint/809687

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year


Information about this web site

© The University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
+44 (0)1483 300800