University of Surrey

Test tubes in the lab Research in the ATI Dance Research

Dominant carrier performance and international liberalization - The case of Northeast Asia

Fu, X, Oum, TH, Chen, R and Lei, Z (2015) Dominant carrier performance and international liberalization - The case of Northeast Asia Transport Policy, 43. pp. 61-75.

Text (licence)
Available under License : See the attached licence file.

Download (33kB) | Preview
[img] Text
NEAsia-3March2015_acceepted version.pdf - Accepted version Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only until 1 April 2017.
Available under License : See the attached licence file.

Download (708kB)


This study investigates the links between domestic market regulation, dominant airline performance, and international market liberalization in Northeast Asia (NEA). The study focuses on China, where substantial regulations are still present in the aviation market, particularly in areas such as route entry, airport slot allocation, input supply, and aviation support services. These regulations limit the ability of entrant airlines to compete in hub airports, and allow dominant airlines to strengthen their market power and achieve substantial growth at the expense of their competitors. Current Chinese regulations assist major state-owned carriers by suppressing domestic competition, particularly in markets linked to hub airports. If national policy in China continues to be guided by requirements created to support the dominant airlines, in the short term there will be limited liberalization on routes linked with hub airports. Promoting LCC services in the region is one practical alternative for the short term which could prevent major disruption to network carriers. This investigation suggests that Chinese airlines would be less resistant to bilateral liberalization with ASEAN, Oceanian or European nations than they would with other regions, as they are well positioned in these markets, and may be able to develop their hub airports into Asia's gateways to Europe. In the long term, however, there is no substitute for full liberalization if NEA governments want their nations to fully benefit from enabling their carriers and hub airports to achieve global competitiveness.

Item Type: Article
Divisions : Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences > School of Hospitality and Tourism Management
Authors :
Date : 1 October 2015
Identification Number : 10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.05.010
Additional Information : © 2015. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license
Depositing User : Symplectic Elements
Date Deposited : 24 Nov 2015 15:46
Last Modified : 24 Nov 2015 15:46

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item


Downloads per month over past year

Information about this web site

© The University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
+44 (0)1483 300800