University of Surrey

Test tubes in the lab Research in the ATI Dance Research

Reference amounts utilised in front of package nutrition labelling; impact on product healthfulness evaluations

Raats, MM, Hieke, S, Jola, C, Hodgkins, C, Kennedy, J and Wills, J (2015) Reference amounts utilised in front of package nutrition labelling; impact on product healthfulness evaluations EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 69 (5). pp. 619-625.

[img]
Preview
Text
Raats et al (2015) Reference amounts utilised in front of package nutrition labelling. impact on product healthfulness evaluations EJCN.pdf
Available under License : See the attached licence file.

Download (611kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text (licence)
SRI_deposit_agreement.pdf
Available under License : See the attached licence file.

Download (33kB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The research question addressed in this paper is how different reference amounts utilised in front of package nutrition labelling influence evaluation of product healthfulness. SUBJECTS/METHODS: A total of 13,117 participants from six European countries (Germany, UK, Spain, France, Poland and Sweden) were recruited via online panels. A mixed between/within-subject factorial design was employed with food (biscuits, sandwiches, yogurts), healthfulness and presence of Guideline Daily Amounts as within-subjects factors and reference amount ('per 100 g', 'typical portion', 'half portion') and country as between-subjects factors. RESULTS: Overall, people correctly ranked foods according to their objective healthfulness as defined by risk nutrients alone, and could distinguish between more and less healthful variants of foods. General healthfulness associations with the three product categories do not appear to have had a strong influence on product ratings. This study shows that where the reference amount of 'per 100 g' is very different from the 'typical' portion size, as was the case for biscuits, products with a 'per 100 g' label are rated significantly less healthful than the 'typical' or 'half typical' portions. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that across the three food categories, consumers do factor the reference amount, that is, the quantity of food for which the nutritional information is being presented, into their judgements of healthfulness. Therefore, appropriate reference amounts are also of importance for the effective presentation of nutritional information.

Item Type: Article
Divisions : Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences > School of Psychology
Authors :
AuthorsEmailORCID
Raats, MMUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Hieke, SUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Jola, CUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Hodgkins, CUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Kennedy, JUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Wills, JUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Date : 1 May 2015
Identification Number : 10.1038/ejcn.2014.190
Uncontrolled Keywords : Science & Technology, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Nutrition & Dietetics, NUTRIENT PROFILE MODELS, OF-PACK, PERCEIVED HEALTHINESS, PORTION SIZES, ENERGY-INTAKE, SERVING SIZE, FOOD CHOICE, INFORMATION, CONSUMERS, SYSTEMS
Related URLs :
Depositing User : Symplectic Elements
Date Deposited : 15 Sep 2015 10:12
Last Modified : 01 Nov 2015 02:08
URI: http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/id/eprint/808385

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year


Information about this web site

© The University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
+44 (0)1483 300800