University of Surrey

Test tubes in the lab Research in the ATI Dance Research

Do preference reversals generalise? Results on ambiguity and loss aversion

Bardsley, NO, , Ball, LJ, and Ormerod, TC (2012) Do preference reversals generalise? Results on ambiguity and loss aversion Journal of Economic Psychology, 33. pp. 48-57.

[img]
Preview
Text
Bardsley et al Preference Reversals JOEP 2012 accepted.pdf - ["content_typename_UNSPECIFIED" not defined]
Available under License : See the attached licence file.

Download (554kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
PDF (licence)
SRI_deposit_agreement.pdf
Available under License : See the attached licence file.

Download (33kB) | Preview

Abstract

Preference reversals are frequently observed in the lab, but almost all designs use completely transparent prospects, which are rarely features of decision making elsewhere. This raises questions of external validity. We test the robustness of the phenomenon to gambles which incorporate realistic ambiguity in payoffs and probabilities. In addition, we test a recent rationalisation of preference reversals by Third Generation Prospect Theory, which would also restrict the incidence of reversals outside the lab. According to this account, reversals occur largely because the selling protocol generally used for the valuation task activates loss aversion, which is excluded by the free gift protocol of the choice task. We find that reversals are not dependent on these procedures, though they seem to be encouraged by transparency.

Item Type: Article
Divisions : Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences > School of Psychology
Authors :
AuthorsEmailORCID
Bardsley, NO, UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Ball, LJ, UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Ormerod, TCUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Date : 1 February 2012
Identification Number : 10.1016/j.joep.2011.09.001
Uncontrolled Keywords : Preference Reversals, External Validity, Ambiguity, Loss Aversion
Additional Information : NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Economic Psychology. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Economic Psychology, 33, February 2012, DOI 10.1016/j.joep.2011.09.001.
Depositing User : Symplectic Elements
Date Deposited : 18 Jun 2014 11:35
Last Modified : 19 Jul 2014 13:35
URI: http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/id/eprint/805043

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year


Information about this web site

© The University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
+44 (0)1483 300800