Family members' perspectives on potential discussions about life prolongation for their older relatives
Garnett, D, Vandrevala, T, Hampson, SE, Daly, T and Arber, S (2008) Family members' perspectives on potential discussions about life prolongation for their older relatives Mortality, 13 (1). pp. 65-81.
Arber 2008 Family members perspectives.pdf - ["content_typename_UNSPECIFIED" not defined]
Download (188kB) | Preview
Family members (or health-care confidants) of incapacitated patients are often consulted by doctors when making life-prolongation decisions. Little research has been conducted on confidants' views on life prolongation and advance care planning. This study investigated the health-care confidant's view on life prolongation and their involvement in being a potential decision-maker for their relatives in the event of incapacitation. Confidants (N = 12) were interviewed and interviews were analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. The analysis revealed three themes relating to their perception of being a potential decision-maker for a relative's life prolonging measures: “good” and “bad” death based on past experience and perceptions of quality of life, a sense that discussions were inappropriate at present, and strategies which might be used to encourage discussion. The implications of these findings for family involvement in life-prolongation decisions and how to encourage family discussions about life prolongation are discussed.
|Divisions :||Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences > Department of Sociology|
|Identification Number :||https://doi.org/10.1080/13576270701783124|
|Related URLs :|
|Additional Information :||This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Mortality on 18/01/2008, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/13576270701783124|
|Depositing User :||Symplectic Elements|
|Date Deposited :||19 May 2015 15:57|
|Last Modified :||01 Jun 2015 13:33|
Actions (login required)
Downloads per month over past year