University of Surrey

Test tubes in the lab Research in the ATI Dance Research

Does hospital competition save lives?: evidence from the English NHS patient choice reforms

Cooper, ZN, Gibbons, S, Jones, S and McGuire, A (2010) Does hospital competition save lives?: evidence from the English NHS patient choice reforms Working Paper. LSE Health, The London School of Econom ics and Political Science.

[img] Text
WP16.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License : See the attached licence file.

Download (2MB)
[img]
Preview
Text (licence)
SRI_deposit_agreement.pdf
Available under License : See the attached licence file.

Download (33kB) | Preview

Abstract

This paper examines whether or not hospital competition in a market with fixed reimbursement prices can prompt improvements in clinical quality. In January 2006, the British Government introduced a major extension of their market-based reforms to the English National Health Service. From January 2006 onwards, every patient in England could choose their hospital for secondary care and hospitals had to compete with each other to attract patients to secure their revenue. One of the central aims of this policy was to create financial incentives for providers to improve their clinical performance. This paper assesses whether this aim has been achieved and competition led to improvements in quality. For our estimation, we exploit the fact that choice-based reforms will create sharper financial incentives for hospitals in markets where choice is geographically feasible and that prior to 2006, in the absence of patient choice, hospitals had no direct financial incentive to improve performance in order to attract more patients. We use a modified difference-in-difference estimator to analyze whether quality improved more quickly in more competitive markets after the government introduced its new wave of market-based reforms. Using AMI mortality as a quality indicator, we find that mortality fell more quickly (i.e. quality improved) for patients living in more competitive markets after the introduction of hospital competition in January 2006. Our results suggest that hospital competition in markets with fixed prices can lead to improvements in clinical quality

Item Type: Monograph (Working Paper)
Authors :
NameEmailORCID
Cooper, ZNUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Gibbons, SUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Jones, SUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
McGuire, AUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Date : 1 January 2010
Uncontrolled Keywords : Health Care, Quality, Competition, Choice, Incentives, Reimbursement
Related URLs :
Depositing User : Symplectic Elements
Date Deposited : 23 Jun 2017 16:16
Last Modified : 23 Jun 2017 16:17
URI: http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/id/eprint/804169

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year


Information about this web site

© The University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
+44 (0)1483 300800