University of Surrey

Test tubes in the lab Research in the ATI Dance Research

Defining ‘periphrasis’: key notions

Brown, DP, Chumakina, M, , Corbett, G, Popova, G., and Spencer, A., (2012) Defining ‘periphrasis’: key notions Morphology, 22 (2). pp. 233-275.

[img]
Preview
PDF
Brown_Corbett 2012 DefiningPeriphrasis Key notions.pdf
Available under License : See the attached licence file.

Download (920kB)
[img]
Preview
PDF (licence)
SRI_deposit_agreement.pdf

Download (33kB)

Abstract

We examine the notion of ‘(inflectional) periphrasis’ within the framework of Canonical Typology, and argue that the canonical approach allows us to define a logically coherent notion of periphrasis. We propose a set of canonical criteria for inflectional morphology and a set of canonical criteria for functional syntax, that is, syntactic constructions which include functional elements and which express grammatical features. We argue that canonical periphrasis is exemplified in our theoretical space of possibilities whenever a cell in a (canonically morphological) inflectional paradigm (‘feature intersection’) is expressed by a multiword construction which respects the canonical properties of functional syntax. We compare our canonically-based approach with the approach of other authors, notably, Ackerman & Stump (2004), who argue for three sufficient conditions for a construction to be regarded as periphrastic: feature intersection, non-compositionality and distributed exponence. We argue that non-compositionality and distributed exponence, while sometimes diagnostic of periphrasis on a language-particular basis, do not constitute canonical properties of periphrasis. We also examine crucial but neglected syntactic aspects of periphrastic constructions: recursion of periphrases and headedness of periphrastic constructions. The approach we propose allows us to distinguish between constructions in actual languages which approximate the ideal of canonical periphrasis to various degrees without committing us to a categorical distinction between periphrastic and non-periphrastic constructions. At the same time we can capture the intuition that there is in some languages a distinct identifiable set of multiword constructions whose principal role is to realize grammatical features.

Item Type: Article
Divisions : Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences > School of English and Languages > English > Surrey Morphology Group
Authors :
AuthorsEmailORCID
Brown, DPUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Chumakina, M, UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Corbett, GUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Popova, G., UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Spencer, A., UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Date : 18 March 2012
Identification Number : 10.1007/s11525-012-9201-5
Related URLs :
Additional Information : The original publication is available at http://www.springerlink.com
Depositing User : Symplectic Elements
Date Deposited : 11 Jun 2014 10:33
Last Modified : 06 Aug 2014 13:33
URI: http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/id/eprint/772773

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year


Information about this web site

© The University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
+44 (0)1483 300800