University of Surrey

Test tubes in the lab Research in the ATI Dance Research

Necessity Killed the GATT - Art XX GATT and the Misleading Rhetoric about ‘Weighing and Balancing’

Fontanelli, F (2013) Necessity Killed the GATT - Art XX GATT and the Misleading Rhetoric about ‘Weighing and Balancing’ European Journal of Legal Studies, 5 (2). pp. 36-56.

2012 EJLS - Fontanelli XX GATT.pdf
Available under License : See the attached licence file.

Download (430kB)
PDF (licence)

Download (33kB)


Art XX GATT, listing the policy grounds available to WTO Members that wish to deviate from their GATT obligations, makes some of them conditional on a requirement of necessity in relation to the pursued interest. In their reports, Panels and the AB have developed the analysis of this element in two separate but interlaced tests: one whereby they allegedly perform an exercise of ‘weighing and balancing’ of the interests involved (a value-judgment), the other ascertaining the trade-restrictiveness of the measures challenged (an optimization analysis). It is submitted that an appraisal of the case-law demonstrates that this distinction is artificial, and most importantly, that no real balancing is ever performed - or in any event, relied on - to determine the outcome of a dispute (Claim 1). However, a diffuse trend of ‘strict proportionality’ is discernible in the case-law, not so much within the ‘weigh and balance’ analysis, but within the trade-restrictiveness test. The latter, therefore, is arguably less value-neutral than the quasi-judicial bodies would claim it to be, and then WTO Members tend to understand, when construing the necessity requirement (Claim 2).

Item Type: Article
Authors :
Date : 27 January 2013
Depositing User : Symplectic Elements
Date Deposited : 11 Feb 2013 14:29
Last Modified : 23 Sep 2013 20:00

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item


Downloads per month over past year

Information about this web site

© The University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
+44 (0)1483 300800