Awkward States and Regional Organizations: The UK and Australia Compared
Murray, P, Warleigh-Lack, A and He, B (2014) Awkward States and Regional Organizations: The UK and Australia Compared Comparative European Politics, 12 (3). pp. 279-300.
Awkward States and Regional Organisations FINAL DRAFT.doc
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License : See the attached licence file.
Download (245kB) | Preview
Both the United Kingdom and Australia have been studied by specialists in each region rather than by comparativists. This article seeks to fill this gap by examining the regional ‘awkwardness’ of the United Kingdom and Australia comparatively. Australia and Britain are ‘awkward’ states in their respective regions – Asia and Europe. This is clear in their approaches to institutions, economic policy, security and identity. We examine comparatively the role of power, institutions, economy, domestic politics and culture to see which mix best accounts for the awkward status of these two states. Through this comparison, this article demonstrates that the so-called ‘uniqueness’ of the United Kingdom in regionalism literature is in fact a nearly ‘universal’ phenomenon, insofar as many global regions include awkward states.
|Divisions :||Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences > Department of Politics|
|Date :||13 March 2014|
|Identification Number :||10.1057/cep.2013.2|
|Related URLs :|
|Additional Information :||This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Comparative European Politics. The definitive publisher-authenticated version Murray P, Warleigh-Lack A, He B. Awkward States and Regional Organizations: The UK and Australia Compared. Comparative European Politics 12(3):279-300 is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/cep.2013.2|
|Depositing User :||Symplectic Elements|
|Date Deposited :||31 Oct 2014 17:51|
|Last Modified :||17 Jan 2015 14:50|
Actions (login required)
Downloads per month over past year