University of Surrey

Test tubes in the lab Research in the ATI Dance Research

An exploration of food intolerance in the primary care setting: The general practitioner's experience

Nelson, M and Ogden, J (2008) An exploration of food intolerance in the primary care setting: The general practitioner's experience Social Science & Medicine, 67 (6). pp. 1038-1045.

[img]
Preview
PDF
Ogden 2008 An exploration of food intolerance miaGP.pdf
Available under License : See the attached licence file.

Download (75kB)
[img]
Preview
PDF (licence)
SRI_deposit_agreement.pdf

Download (33kB)

Abstract

Food intolerance is one of medicine's modern enigmas. Its etiology and mechanism are unclear and the subject of constant debate, while estimates of its prevalence vary widely from 2% to over 20% of the population. Using interpretive phenomenonological analysis, this study explored the phenomenon of food intolerance in primary care from the general practitioner's (GP) perspective. Semi-structured interviews were carried out with 17 GPs from around the UK. Food intolerance was primarily conceptualised as a spectrum of clinical importance with medical conditions arranged in three hierarchies; the certainty that the GP would have in making a diagnosis, the authenticity of the patients' experience, and the threat posed to physical health. Since some conditions within the spectrum had a medical name that was used in preference to the term ‘food intolerance’, food intolerance essentially became a ‘dustbin diagnosis’, focused at just one end of the spectrum and viewed with scepticism. The scepticism about food intolerance as a specific condition influenced the GPs' perceptions of patients and of the patients' underlying problems. This was, however, tempered by an element of awareness of the limitations of modern medicine. Rather than risk damaging the doctor–patient relationship, the GPs chose, despite their scepticism, to negotiate mutually acceptable ground with patients and with patients' beliefs. As a result, whether due to a placebo effect, secondary benefit, or as a biophysical result of excluding a food from the diet, the GPs acknowledged both personal and therapeutic benefit in working with the patients' belief in food intolerance and with behaviours associated with the beliefs.

Item Type: Article
Divisions : Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences > School of Psychology
Authors :
AuthorsEmailORCID
Nelson, MUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Ogden, JUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Date : 1 September 2008
Identification Number : 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.05.025
Uncontrolled Keywords : Science & Technology, Social Sciences, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Public, Environmental & Occupational Health, Social Sciences, Biomedical, Biomedical Social Sciences, UK, food intolerance, primary care, clinical uncertainty, disputed diagnoses, general practitioner (GP), IRRITABLE-BOWEL-SYNDROME, CHRONIC-FATIGUE-SYNDROME, MEDICAL ENCOUNTER, UNCERTAINTY, ILLNESS, ALLERGY, PRESENTATIONS, PSYCHOLOGY, MANAGEMENT, COMMUNITY
Related URLs :
Additional Information : NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Social Science & Medicine. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Social Science and Medicine, 67 (6), 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.05.025
Depositing User : Symplectic Elements
Date Deposited : 17 Jan 2013 16:27
Last Modified : 23 Sep 2013 19:45
URI: http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/id/eprint/732548

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year


Information about this web site

© The University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
+44 (0)1483 300800