On the experience of conducting a Systematic Review in Industrial, Work and Organizational Psychology: Yes it is Worthwhile
Tools
Tools
Tools
Rojon, C, McDowall, A and Saunders, MNK (2011) On the experience of conducting a Systematic Review in Industrial, Work and Organizational Psychology: Yes it is Worthwhile Journal of Personnel Psychology, 10 (3). 133 - 138. ISSN 1866-5888
![[img]](/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png)
| PDF - Accepted Version Available under License : See the attached licence file. 101Kb | |
![[img]](/style/images/fileicons/text_plain.png) | Plain Text (licence) 1516b |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000041
Abstract
Systematic Review methodology (SRm) is an increasingly popular choice for literature reviews in the Social Sciences. While compared to traditional narrative reviews SRm appears time-consuming and laborious, transparency and replicability of the methodology is argued to facilitate greater clarity of review. Nevertheless, researchers in Industrial, Work, and Organizational (IWO) Psychology have yet to embrace this methodology. Drawing on experience from conducting a Systematic Review (SR) of individual workplace performance we explore the premise: The advantages of SRm to IWO Psychology researchers outweigh the disadvantages. We offer observations, insights, and potential solutions to challenges faced during the reviewing process, concluding that SRm is worthwhile for IWO Psychology researchers
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Divisions: | Faculty of Business, Economics and Law > Surrey Business School |
| Related URLs: | |
| ID Code: | 7300 |
| Deposited By: | Symplectic Elements |
| Deposited On: | 07 Oct 2011 10:18 |
| Last Modified: | 13 Jun 2013 14:42 |
Document Downloads
Repository Staff Only: item control page