On the experience of conducting a Systematic Review in Industrial, Work and Organizational Psychology: Yes it is Worthwhile
Rojon, C, McDowall, A and Saunders, MNK (2011) On the experience of conducting a Systematic Review in Industrial, Work and Organizational Psychology: Yes it is Worthwhile Journal of Personnel Psychology, 10 (3). pp. 133-138.
Microsoft Word - Manuscript_JPPSY-D-11-00020_ pre publication version.pdf - Accepted version Manuscript
Available under License : See the attached licence file.
Plain Text (licence)
Systematic Review methodology (SRm) is an increasingly popular choice for literature reviews in the Social Sciences. While compared to traditional narrative reviews SRm appears time-consuming and laborious, transparency and replicability of the methodology is argued to facilitate greater clarity of review. Nevertheless, researchers in Industrial, Work, and Organizational (IWO) Psychology have yet to embrace this methodology. Drawing on experience from conducting a Systematic Review (SR) of individual workplace performance we explore the premise: The advantages of SRm to IWO Psychology researchers outweigh the disadvantages. We offer observations, insights, and potential solutions to challenges faced during the reviewing process, concluding that SRm is worthwhile for IWO Psychology researchers
|Divisions :||Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences > Surrey Business School|
|Date :||September 2011|
|Identification Number :||https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000041|
|Related URLs :|
|Depositing User :||Symplectic Elements|
|Date Deposited :||07 Oct 2011 09:18|
|Last Modified :||23 Sep 2013 18:46|
Actions (login required)
Downloads per month over past year