Equity, waiting times, and NHS reforms: Retrospective study
Cooper, ZN, McGuire, A, Jones, S and Le Grand, J (2009) Equity, waiting times, and NHS reforms: Retrospective study BMJ (Online), 339 (7722). pp. 673-675.
2009 - bmj - Equity, Waiting Times and the NHS Reforms.pdf
Available under License : See the attached licence file.
Objective: To determine whether observable changes in waiting times occurred for certain key elective procedures between 1997 and 2007 in the English National Health Service and to analyse the distribution of those changes between socioeconomic groups as an indicator of equity. Design: Retrospective study of population-wide, patient level data using ordinary least squares regression to investigate the statistical relation between waiting times and patients' socioeconomic status. Setting: English NHS from 1997 to 2007. Participants: 427 277 patients who had elective knee replacement, 406 253 who had elective hip replacement, and 2 568 318 who had elective cataract repair. Main outcome measures: Days waited from referral for surgery to surgery itself; socioeconomic status based on Carstairs index of deprivation. Results: Mean and median waiting times rose initially and then fell steadily over time. By 2007 variation in waiting times across the population tended to be lower. In 1997 waiting times and deprivation tended to be positively related. By 2007 the relation between deprivation and waiting time was less pronounced, and, in some cases, patients from the most deprived fifth were waiting less time than patients from the most advantaged fifth. Conclusions: Between 1997 and 2007 waiting times for patients having elective hip replacement, knee replacement, and cataract repair in England went down and the variation in waiting times for those procedures across socioeconomic groups was reduced. Many people feared that the government's NHS reforms would lead to inequity, but inequity with respect to waiting times did not increase; if anything, it decreased. Although proving that the later stages of those reforms, which included patient choice, provider competition, and expanded capacity, was a catalyst for improvements in equity is impossible, the data show that these reforms, at a minimum, did not harm equity.
|Divisions :||Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences > Surrey Business School|
|Date :||19 September 2009|
|Identification Number :||https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b3264|
|Additional Information :||Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b3264 doi:10.1136/bmj.b3264 Copyright 2009 BMJ Group. Available under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commerical License|
|Depositing User :||Symplectic Elements|
|Date Deposited :||23 Oct 2012 10:48|
|Last Modified :||26 Jul 2016 10:10|
Actions (login required)
Downloads per month over past year