University of Surrey

Test tubes in the lab Research in the ATI Dance Research

Negotiation on the assessment of research articles with academic reviewers: Application of peer-review approach of teaching

Kumar, P, Rafiq, MI and Imam, B (2011) Negotiation on the assessment of research articles with academic reviewers: Application of peer-review approach of teaching Higher Education, 62 (3). 315 - 332. ISSN 0018-1560

[img]
Preview
PDF
Negotiation_HigherEducation.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License : See the attached licence file.

Download (522Kb)
[img] Plain Text (licence)
licence.txt
Available under License : See the attached licence file.

Download (1516b)
[img] Plain Text (licence)
licence.txt

Download (1516b)

Abstract

This study provides an insight into the dominant negotiation processes that occur between the authors of research articles and academic reviewers at the peer reviewing stage. Data of reviewers comments and authors responses on 32 science and engineering based journal articles covering four decision categories (accept as is, accept with minor revisions, major revisions and reject) were collected. A commonly practised peer-review approach in teaching was applied to analyse the data and to identify the key negotiation attributes, their frequency of occurrence, authors' reaction and approach to negotiate with the reviewers. Six main negotiation attributes were identified. Technical quality was the most frequent (31% of all instances) attracting mixed reactions from the authors. The remaining attributes constituted suggestion (20%), explanation (20%), restatement (15%), grammar (13%) and structure (~1%). With the exception of `explanation' where authors had to counteract to clear misunderstood concepts or contents by the reviewers, the other attributes were of highly collaborative nature and were willingly accepted by the authors. All these negotiations were found to help authors in improving the overall quality, clarity and readability of their manuscripts, besides forcing them to rethink about unclear contents. The negotiation trends emerged here can help the academic researchers to improve the quality of their articles before submission to the peer-reviewed journals. It can also provide a link through which their classroom teaching experience involving supervision of peer review negotiations among students can be utilised in writing their research articles and negotiating with academic reviewers.

Item Type: Article
Divisions: Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences > Civil and Environmental Engineering
Depositing User: Symplectic Elements
Date Deposited: 22 Sep 2011 12:07
Last Modified: 23 Sep 2013 18:44
URI: http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/id/eprint/7151

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year


Information about this web site

© The University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
+44 (0)1483 300800